Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 17758:5863f0e4cd3a
histedit: replace various nodes lists with replacement graph (and issue3582)
This changeset rewrites the change tracking logic of histedit to record every
operation it does. Tracked operations record the full list of "old" node that
will eventually be removed to the list of new nodes that replace it. Operations
on temporary nodes are tracked too. Dropped changesets are also recorded as an
"old" node replacement by nothing. This logic is similar to the obsolescence
marker one and will be used for this purpose in later commit.
This new logic implies a big amount of change in the histedit code base.
histedit action functions now always return a tuple of
(new-ctx, [list of rewriting operations])
The old `created`, `replaced` and `tmpnodes` are no longer returned and stored
during histedit operation. When such information is necessary it is computed
from the replacement graph. This computation is done in the `processreplacement`
function.
The `replacemap` is also dropped. It is computed at the end of the command from the
graph. The `bootstrapcontinue` methods are altered to compute this different kind of
information.
This new mechanism requires much less information to be written on disk.
Note:
This changes allows a more accurate bookmark movement. bookmark on dropped
changeset are now move of their parent (or replacement of their parent)
instead of their children.
This fix issue3582
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:36:50 +0200 |
parents | f2719b387380 |
children | aa9385f983fa |
line wrap: on
line source
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for changesets, so first we have to recreate it o 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 $ mkrev() > { > revno=$1 > echo "rev $revno" > echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt > hg -q ci -m"rev $revno" > } setup test repo1 $ hg init repo1 $ cd repo1 $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt $ hg ci -Am"rev 0" adding foo.txt $ mkrev 1 rev 1 first branch $ mkrev 2 rev 2 $ mkrev 3 rev 3 back to rev 1 to create second branch $ hg up -r1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 4 rev 4 $ mkrev 5 rev 5 merge first branch to second branch $ hg up -C -r5 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch" one more commit following the merge $ mkrev 7 rev 7 back to "second branch" to make another head $ hg up -r5 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 8 rev 8 $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "graphlog=" >> $HGRCPATH the story so far $ hg glog --template "{rev}\n" @ 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2 comparing with ../repo2 searching for changes 4 5 6 7 8 test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it actually bundles 7 $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2 searching for changes 5 changesets found test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle 5 changesets found $ cd ..