view tests/test-issue842.t @ 20030:5931489b65e0

obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the incoming obsolescence stream. Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink> anyway.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org>
date Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:31:58 -0500
parents 41885892796e
children 2fc86d92c4a9
line wrap: on
line source

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue842

  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg ci -Ama
  adding a

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo bar > a

Should issue new head warning:

  $ hg ci -Amb
  adding a
  created new head

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo stuffy > a

Should not issue new head warning:

  $ hg ci -q -Amc

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo crap > a
  $ hg branch testing
  marked working directory as branch testing
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)

Should not issue warning:

  $ hg ci -q -Amd