view tests/test-merge4.t @ 20030:5931489b65e0

obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the incoming obsolescence stream. Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink> anyway.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org>
date Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:31:58 -0500
parents 63c817ea4a70
children 8561ad49915d
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #1"
  $ hg update 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo This is file c1 > c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg commit -m "commit #2"
  created new head
  $ hg merge 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ rm b
  $ echo This is file c22 > c

Test hg behaves when committing with a missing file added by a merge

  $ hg commit -m "commit #3"
  abort: cannot commit merge with missing files
  [255]