view tests/test-update-issue1456.t @ 20030:5931489b65e0

obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange

Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an
obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the
incoming obsolescence stream.

Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but
they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless
and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink>
anyway.

  $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" execbit || exit 80

  $ rm -rf a
  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm0
  $ echo toremove > toremove
  $ echo todelete > todelete
  $ chmod +x foo toremove todelete
  $ hg ci -qAm1

Test that local removed/deleted, remote removed works with flags
  $ hg rm toremove
  $ rm todelete
  $ hg co -q 0

  $ echo dirty > foo
  $ hg up -c
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg up -q
  $ cat foo
  dirty
  $ hg st -A
  M foo
  C todelete
  C toremove

Validate update of standalone execute bit change:

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ chmod -x foo
  $ hg ci -m removeexec
  nothing changed
  [1]
  $ hg up -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg st

  $ cd ..