view tests/test-casecollision-merge.t @ 26623:5a95fe44121d

clonebundles: support for seeding clones from pre-generated bundles

Cloning can be an expensive operation for servers because the server
generates a bundle from existing repository data at request time. For
a large repository like mozilla-central, this consumes 4+ minutes
of CPU time on the server. It also results in significant network
utilization. Multiplied by hundreds or even thousands of clients and
the ensuing load can result in difficulties scaling the Mercurial server.

Despite generation of bundles being deterministic until the next
changeset is added, the generation of bundles to service a clone request
is not cached. Each clone thus performs redundant work. This is
wasteful.

This patch introduces the "clonebundles" extension and related
client-side functionality to help alleviate this deficiency. The
client-side feature is behind an experimental flag and is not enabled by
default.

It works as follows:

1) Server operator generates a bundle and makes it available on a
   server (likely HTTP).
2) Server operator defines the URL of a bundle file in a
   .hg/clonebundles.manifest file.
3) Client `hg clone`ing sees the server is advertising bundle URLs.
4) Client fetches and applies the advertised bundle.
5) Client performs equivalent of `hg pull` to fetch changes made since
   the bundle was created.

Essentially, the server performs the expensive work of generating a
bundle once and all subsequent clones fetch a static file from
somewhere. Scaling static file serving is a much more manageable
problem than scaling a Python application like Mercurial. Assuming your
repository grows less than 1% per day, the end result is 99+% of CPU
and network load from clones is eliminated, allowing Mercurial servers
to scale more easily. Serving static files also means data can be
transferred to clients as fast as they can consume it, rather than as
fast as servers can generate it. This makes clones faster.

Mozilla has implemented similar functionality of this patch on
hg.mozilla.org using a custom extension. We are hosting bundle files in
Amazon S3 and CloudFront (a CDN) and have successfully offloaded
>1 TB/day in data transfer from hg.mozilla.org, freeing up significant
bandwidth and CPU resources. The positive impact has been stellar and
I believe it has proved its value to be included in Mercurial core. I
feel it is important for the client-side support to be enabled in core
by default because it means that clients will get faster, more reliable
clones and will enable server operators to reduce load without
requiring any client-side configuration changes (assuming clients are
up to date, of course).

The scope of this feature is narrowly and specifically tailored to
cloning, despite "serve pulls from pre-generated bundles" being a valid
and useful feature. I would eventually like for Mercurial servers to
support transferring *all* repository data via statically hosted files.
You could imagine a server that siphons all pushed data to bundle files
and instructs clients to apply a stream of bundles to reconstruct all
repository data. This feature, while useful and powerful, is
significantly more work to implement because it requires the server
component have awareness of discovery and a mapping of which changesets
are in which files. Full, clone bundles, by contrast, are much simpler.

The wire protocol command is named "clonebundles" instead of something
more generic like "staticbundles" to leave the door open for a new, more
powerful and more generic server-side component with minimal backwards
compatibility implications. The name "bundleclone" is used by Mozilla's
extension and would cause problems since there are subtle differences
in Mozilla's extension.

Mozilla's experience with this idea has taught us that some form of
"content negotiation" is required. Not all clients will support all
bundle formats or even URLs (advanced TLS requirements, etc). To ensure
the highest uptake possible, a server needs to advertise multiple
versions of bundles and clients need to be able to choose the most
appropriate from that list one. The "attributes" in each
server-advertised entry facilitate this filtering and sorting. Their
use will become apparent in subsequent patches.

Initial inspiration and credit for the idea of cloning from static files
belongs to Augie Fackler and his "lookaside clone" extension proof of
concept.

#require icasefs

################################
test for branch merging
################################

test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:

(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file:
this is also case for issue3370.

  $ hg init branch_merge_renaming
  $ cd branch_merge_renaming

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg tag -l A
  $ hg rename a tmp
  $ hg rename tmp A
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ hg tag -l B
  $ hg update -q 0
  $ touch x
  $ hg add x
  $ hg commit -m '#2'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l C

  $ hg merge -q
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  R a
  C b
  C x

  $ hg update -q --clean 1
  $ hg merge -q
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C A
  C b
  $ hg commit -m '(D)'
  $ hg tag -l D

additional test for issue3452:

| this assumes the history below.
|
|  (A) -- (C) -- (E) -------
|      \      \             \
|       \      \             \
|         (B) -- (D) -- (F) -- (G)
|
|   A: add file 'a'
|   B: rename from 'a' to 'A'
|   C: add 'x' (or operation other than modification of 'a')
|   D: merge C into B
|   E: modify 'a'
|   F: modify 'A'
|   G: merge E into F
|
| issue3452 occurs when (B) is recorded before (C)

  $ hg update -q --clean C
  $ echo "modify 'a' at (E)" > a
  $ echo "modify 'b' at (E)" > b
  $ hg commit -m '(E)'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l E

  $ hg update -q --clean D
  $ echo "modify 'A' at (F)" > A
  $ hg commit -m '(F)'
  $ hg tag -l F

  $ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
  $ hg status -A
  M A
    a
  M b
  C x
  $ cat A
  modify 'a' at (E)

test also the case that (B) is recorded after (C), to prevent
regression by changes in the future.

to avoid unexpected (successful) behavior by filelog unification,
target file is not 'a'/'A' but 'b'/'B' in this case.

  $ hg update -q --clean A
  $ hg rename b tmp
  $ hg rename tmp B
  $ hg commit -m '(B1)'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l B1

  $ hg merge -q C
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C B
  C a
  $ hg commit -m '(D1)'
  $ hg tag -l D1

  $ echo "modify 'B' at (F1)" > B
  $ hg commit -m '(F1)'
  $ hg tag -l F1

  $ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
  $ hg status -A
  M B
    b
  M a
  C x
  $ cat B
  modify 'b' at (E)

  $ cd ..

(2) colliding file is not related to collided file

  $ hg init branch_merge_collding
  $ cd branch_merge_collding

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg remove a
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ echo A > A
  $ hg add A
  $ hg commit -m '#2'
  $ hg update --clean 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo x > x
  $ hg add x
  $ hg commit -m '#3'
  created new head
  $ echo 'modified at #4' > a
  $ hg commit -m '#4'

  $ hg merge
  abort: case-folding collision between a and A
  [255]
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  4
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  C x
  $ cat a
  modified at #4

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  abort: case-folding collision between a and A
  [255]
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  2
  $ hg status -A
  C A
  $ cat A
  A

test for deletion awareness of case-folding collision check (issue3648):
revision '#3' doesn't change 'a', so 'a' should be recognized as
safely removed in merging between #2 and #3.

  $ hg update --clean 3
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  R a
  C x

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C A

  $ cd ..


################################
test for linear updates
################################

test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:

(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_1
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_1

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg rename a tmp
  $ hg rename tmp A
  $ hg commit -m '#1'

  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo 'this is added line' >> a
  $ hg update 1
  merging a and A to A
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  $ cat A
  a
  this is added line

  $ cd ..

(2) colliding file is not related to collided file

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_2
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_2

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg remove a
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ echo A > A
  $ hg add A
  $ hg commit -m '#2'

  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  0
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  $ cat A
  a
  $ hg up -qC 2

  $ hg update --check 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  0
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  $ cat a
  a

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  2
  $ hg status -A
  C A
  $ cat A
  A

  $ cd ..

(3) colliding file is not related to collided file: added in working dir

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_3
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_3

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg rename a b
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo B > B
  $ hg add B
  $ hg status
  A B
  $ hg update
  abort: case-folding collision between b and B
  [255]

  $ hg update --check
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]

  $ hg update --clean
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  1
  $ hg status -A
  C b
  $ cat b
  a

  $ cd ..