Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-filebranch.t @ 26623:5a95fe44121d
clonebundles: support for seeding clones from pre-generated bundles
Cloning can be an expensive operation for servers because the server
generates a bundle from existing repository data at request time. For
a large repository like mozilla-central, this consumes 4+ minutes
of CPU time on the server. It also results in significant network
utilization. Multiplied by hundreds or even thousands of clients and
the ensuing load can result in difficulties scaling the Mercurial server.
Despite generation of bundles being deterministic until the next
changeset is added, the generation of bundles to service a clone request
is not cached. Each clone thus performs redundant work. This is
wasteful.
This patch introduces the "clonebundles" extension and related
client-side functionality to help alleviate this deficiency. The
client-side feature is behind an experimental flag and is not enabled by
default.
It works as follows:
1) Server operator generates a bundle and makes it available on a
server (likely HTTP).
2) Server operator defines the URL of a bundle file in a
.hg/clonebundles.manifest file.
3) Client `hg clone`ing sees the server is advertising bundle URLs.
4) Client fetches and applies the advertised bundle.
5) Client performs equivalent of `hg pull` to fetch changes made since
the bundle was created.
Essentially, the server performs the expensive work of generating a
bundle once and all subsequent clones fetch a static file from
somewhere. Scaling static file serving is a much more manageable
problem than scaling a Python application like Mercurial. Assuming your
repository grows less than 1% per day, the end result is 99+% of CPU
and network load from clones is eliminated, allowing Mercurial servers
to scale more easily. Serving static files also means data can be
transferred to clients as fast as they can consume it, rather than as
fast as servers can generate it. This makes clones faster.
Mozilla has implemented similar functionality of this patch on
hg.mozilla.org using a custom extension. We are hosting bundle files in
Amazon S3 and CloudFront (a CDN) and have successfully offloaded
>1 TB/day in data transfer from hg.mozilla.org, freeing up significant
bandwidth and CPU resources. The positive impact has been stellar and
I believe it has proved its value to be included in Mercurial core. I
feel it is important for the client-side support to be enabled in core
by default because it means that clients will get faster, more reliable
clones and will enable server operators to reduce load without
requiring any client-side configuration changes (assuming clients are
up to date, of course).
The scope of this feature is narrowly and specifically tailored to
cloning, despite "serve pulls from pre-generated bundles" being a valid
and useful feature. I would eventually like for Mercurial servers to
support transferring *all* repository data via statically hosted files.
You could imagine a server that siphons all pushed data to bundle files
and instructs clients to apply a stream of bundles to reconstruct all
repository data. This feature, while useful and powerful, is
significantly more work to implement because it requires the server
component have awareness of discovery and a mapping of which changesets
are in which files. Full, clone bundles, by contrast, are much simpler.
The wire protocol command is named "clonebundles" instead of something
more generic like "staticbundles" to leave the door open for a new, more
powerful and more generic server-side component with minimal backwards
compatibility implications. The name "bundleclone" is used by Mozilla's
extension and would cause problems since there are subtle differences
in Mozilla's extension.
Mozilla's experience with this idea has taught us that some form of
"content negotiation" is required. Not all clients will support all
bundle formats or even URLs (advanced TLS requirements, etc). To ensure
the highest uptake possible, a server needs to advertise multiple
versions of bundles and clients need to be able to choose the most
appropriate from that list one. The "attributes" in each
server-advertised entry facilitate this filtering and sorting. Their
use will become apparent in subsequent patches.
Initial inspiration and credit for the idea of cloning from static files
belongs to Augie Fackler and his "lookaside clone" extension proof of
concept.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:22:01 -0700 |
parents | 7e9cbb9c6053 |
children | 2428e8ec0793 |
line wrap: on
line source
This test makes sure that we don't mark a file as merged with its ancestor when we do a merge. $ cat <<EOF > merge > import sys, os > print "merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1]) > EOF $ HGMERGE="python ../merge"; export HGMERGE Creating base: $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo 1 > foo $ echo 1 > bar $ echo 1 > baz $ echo 1 > quux $ hg add foo bar baz quux $ hg commit -m "base" $ cd .. $ hg clone a b updating to branch default 4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Creating branch a: $ cd a $ echo 2a > foo $ echo 2a > bar $ hg commit -m "branch a" Creating branch b: $ cd .. $ cd b $ echo 2b > foo $ echo 2b > baz $ hg commit -m "branch b" We shouldn't have anything but n state here: $ hg debugstate --nodates | grep -v "^n" [1] Merging: $ hg pull ../a pulling from ../a searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge) $ hg merge -v resolving manifests getting bar merging foo merging for foo 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo 2m > foo $ echo 2b > baz $ echo new > quux $ hg ci -m "merge" main: we should have a merge here: $ hg debugindex --changelog rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 73 ..... 0 cdca01651b96 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 73 68 ..... 1 f6718a9cb7f3 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re) 2 141 68 ..... 2 bdd988058d16 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re) 3 209 66 ..... 3 d8a521142a3c f6718a9cb7f3 bdd988058d16 (re) log should show foo and quux changed: $ hg log -v -r tip changeset: 3:d8a521142a3c tag: tip parent: 1:f6718a9cb7f3 parent: 2:bdd988058d16 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: foo quux description: merge foo: we should have a merge here: $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) 2 7 4 ..... 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) 3 11 4 ..... 3 aa27919ee430 2ffeddde1b65 33d1fb69067a (re) bar: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) baz: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex baz rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) quux: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex quux rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 5 ..... 3 6128c0f33108 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) Manifest entries should match tips of all files: $ hg manifest --debug 33d1fb69067a0139622a3fa3b7ba1cdb1367972e 644 bar 2ffeddde1b65b4827f6746174a145474129fa2ce 644 baz aa27919ee4303cfd575e1fb932dd64d75aa08be4 644 foo 6128c0f33108e8cfbb4e0824d13ae48b466d7280 644 quux Everything should be clean now: $ hg status $ hg verify checking changesets checking manifests crosschecking files in changesets and manifests checking files 4 files, 4 changesets, 10 total revisions $ cd ..