Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-issue522.t @ 26623:5a95fe44121d
clonebundles: support for seeding clones from pre-generated bundles
Cloning can be an expensive operation for servers because the server
generates a bundle from existing repository data at request time. For
a large repository like mozilla-central, this consumes 4+ minutes
of CPU time on the server. It also results in significant network
utilization. Multiplied by hundreds or even thousands of clients and
the ensuing load can result in difficulties scaling the Mercurial server.
Despite generation of bundles being deterministic until the next
changeset is added, the generation of bundles to service a clone request
is not cached. Each clone thus performs redundant work. This is
wasteful.
This patch introduces the "clonebundles" extension and related
client-side functionality to help alleviate this deficiency. The
client-side feature is behind an experimental flag and is not enabled by
default.
It works as follows:
1) Server operator generates a bundle and makes it available on a
server (likely HTTP).
2) Server operator defines the URL of a bundle file in a
.hg/clonebundles.manifest file.
3) Client `hg clone`ing sees the server is advertising bundle URLs.
4) Client fetches and applies the advertised bundle.
5) Client performs equivalent of `hg pull` to fetch changes made since
the bundle was created.
Essentially, the server performs the expensive work of generating a
bundle once and all subsequent clones fetch a static file from
somewhere. Scaling static file serving is a much more manageable
problem than scaling a Python application like Mercurial. Assuming your
repository grows less than 1% per day, the end result is 99+% of CPU
and network load from clones is eliminated, allowing Mercurial servers
to scale more easily. Serving static files also means data can be
transferred to clients as fast as they can consume it, rather than as
fast as servers can generate it. This makes clones faster.
Mozilla has implemented similar functionality of this patch on
hg.mozilla.org using a custom extension. We are hosting bundle files in
Amazon S3 and CloudFront (a CDN) and have successfully offloaded
>1 TB/day in data transfer from hg.mozilla.org, freeing up significant
bandwidth and CPU resources. The positive impact has been stellar and
I believe it has proved its value to be included in Mercurial core. I
feel it is important for the client-side support to be enabled in core
by default because it means that clients will get faster, more reliable
clones and will enable server operators to reduce load without
requiring any client-side configuration changes (assuming clients are
up to date, of course).
The scope of this feature is narrowly and specifically tailored to
cloning, despite "serve pulls from pre-generated bundles" being a valid
and useful feature. I would eventually like for Mercurial servers to
support transferring *all* repository data via statically hosted files.
You could imagine a server that siphons all pushed data to bundle files
and instructs clients to apply a stream of bundles to reconstruct all
repository data. This feature, while useful and powerful, is
significantly more work to implement because it requires the server
component have awareness of discovery and a mapping of which changesets
are in which files. Full, clone bundles, by contrast, are much simpler.
The wire protocol command is named "clonebundles" instead of something
more generic like "staticbundles" to leave the door open for a new, more
powerful and more generic server-side component with minimal backwards
compatibility implications. The name "bundleclone" is used by Mozilla's
extension and would cause problems since there are subtle differences
in Mozilla's extension.
Mozilla's experience with this idea has taught us that some form of
"content negotiation" is required. Not all clients will support all
bundle formats or even URLs (advanced TLS requirements, etc). To ensure
the highest uptake possible, a server needs to advertise multiple
versions of bundles and clients need to be able to choose the most
appropriate from that list one. The "attributes" in each
server-advertised entry facilitate this filtering and sorting. Their
use will become apparent in subsequent patches.
Initial inspiration and credit for the idea of cloning from static files
belongs to Augie Fackler and his "lookaside clone" extension proof of
concept.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:22:01 -0700 |
parents | 2fc86d92c4a9 |
children | 009d0283de5f |
line wrap: on
line source
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/522 In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge revision. $ hg init $ echo foo > foo $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo' $ echo bar >> foo $ hg ci -m 'change foo' $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo' reverting foo changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e $ hg up -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ touch bar $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar' $ hg merge --debug searching for copies back to rev 1 unmatched files in local: bar resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee foo: remote is newer -> g getting foo 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg debugstate | grep foo m 0 -2 unset foo $ hg st -A foo M foo $ hg ci -m 'merge' $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644 foo $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 5 ..... 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 5 9 ..... 1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re) 2 14 5 ..... 2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)