Mercurial > hg
view mercurial/parser.py @ 19126:5c5152af0d15
log-style: add a log style that is default+phase (issue3436)
There is a new style called phases style.
Usage::
hg log --style phases
Why do we need this new style - in what way is it different from or similar to
existing styles?
The new style is default + phases information. With the new phases feature the
users exhibited their desire for a new style that could help them.
Why do this need a new style - couldn't it be folded into an existing style?
The default style and the new one are about the same, the difference is the
phases tag. The users find both styles useful, this means that the both styles
must exist.
author | Iulian Stana <julian.stana@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:56:57 +0300 |
parents | 8ac8db8dc346 |
children | 7c4778bc29f0 |
line wrap: on
line source
# parser.py - simple top-down operator precedence parser for mercurial # # Copyright 2010 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> # # This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the # GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version. # see http://effbot.org/zone/simple-top-down-parsing.htm and # http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2010/01/02/top-down-operator-precedence-parsing/ # for background # takes a tokenizer and elements # tokenizer is an iterator that returns type, value pairs # elements is a mapping of types to binding strength, prefix and infix actions # an action is a tree node name, a tree label, and an optional match # __call__(program) parses program into a labeled tree import error from i18n import _ class parser(object): def __init__(self, tokenizer, elements, methods=None): self._tokenizer = tokenizer self._elements = elements self._methods = methods self.current = None def _advance(self): 'advance the tokenizer' t = self.current try: self.current = self._iter.next() except StopIteration: pass return t def _match(self, m, pos): 'make sure the tokenizer matches an end condition' if self.current[0] != m: raise error.ParseError(_("unexpected token: %s") % self.current[0], self.current[2]) self._advance() def _parse(self, bind=0): token, value, pos = self._advance() # handle prefix rules on current token prefix = self._elements[token][1] if not prefix: raise error.ParseError(_("not a prefix: %s") % token, pos) if len(prefix) == 1: expr = (prefix[0], value) else: if len(prefix) > 2 and prefix[2] == self.current[0]: self._match(prefix[2], pos) expr = (prefix[0], None) else: expr = (prefix[0], self._parse(prefix[1])) if len(prefix) > 2: self._match(prefix[2], pos) # gather tokens until we meet a lower binding strength while bind < self._elements[self.current[0]][0]: token, value, pos = self._advance() e = self._elements[token] # check for suffix - next token isn't a valid prefix if len(e) == 4 and not self._elements[self.current[0]][1]: suffix = e[3] expr = (suffix[0], expr) else: # handle infix rules if len(e) < 3 or not e[2]: raise error.ParseError(_("not an infix: %s") % token, pos) infix = e[2] if len(infix) == 3 and infix[2] == self.current[0]: self._match(infix[2], pos) expr = (infix[0], expr, (None)) else: expr = (infix[0], expr, self._parse(infix[1])) if len(infix) == 3: self._match(infix[2], pos) return expr def parse(self, message): 'generate a parse tree from a message' self._iter = self._tokenizer(message) self._advance() res = self._parse() token, value, pos = self.current return res, pos def eval(self, tree): 'recursively evaluate a parse tree using node methods' if not isinstance(tree, tuple): return tree return self._methods[tree[0]](*[self.eval(t) for t in tree[1:]]) def __call__(self, message): 'parse a message into a parse tree and evaluate if methods given' t = self.parse(message) if self._methods: return self.eval(t) return t