Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 39224:5e52b6da9c0c
tests: demonstrate a problem with renames on the p2 side of a conversion
I think this is related to the octopus merge being sloppy, and that's having a
cascading affect on the fixup merge. If this change is made on p1 (specifically
with the 'Added parent file' commit), the failure doesn't occur.
The file modification with the rename doesn't seem to be necessary, but it's
what's happening in a production repo where I first noticed, so I left it. This
is an example of the manifest divergence I'd been seeing, which wasn't fixed by
Yuya's recent changes. This is separate from the changelog divergence I was
also seeing[1]. Probably nobody cares about bzr anymore, but this will also
affect git, since the octopus fixup code is in the hg sink.
[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-August/120473.html
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:19:36 -0400 |
parents | b95a6fb7ae66 |
children | cb70501d8b71 |
line wrap: on
line source
Revert interactive tests 1 add and commit file f 2 add commit file folder1/g 3 add and commit file folder2/h 4 add and commit file folder1/i 5 commit change to file f 6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and 9 make workdir match 7 10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [ui] > interactive = true > [extensions] > record = > purge = > EOF $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2 $ cd a $ hg init >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n") and None $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f" $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g" $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h" $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i" >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying f" >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g" >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write(b"e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h" $ hg tip changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: modifying folder2/h $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > ? > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g removing folder1/i reverting folder2/h remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? y diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] ? y - yes, apply this change n - no, skip this change e - edit this change manually s - skip remaining changes to this file f - apply remaining changes to this file d - done, skip remaining changes and files a - apply all changes to all remaining files q - quit, applying no changes ? - ? (display help) apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f Test that --interactive lift the need for --all $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2 reverting folder1/g reverting folder2/h diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q abort: user quit [255] $ ls folder1/ g Test that a noop revert doesn't do an unnecessary backup $ (echo y; echo n) | hg revert -i -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ 3 4 5 -d apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ ls folder1/ g Test --no-backup $ (echo y; echo y) | hg revert -i -C -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ 3 4 5 -d apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y $ ls folder1/ g >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None $ hg update -C 6 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > n > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g removing folder1/i reverting folder2/h remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? n diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f $ hg st M f M folder1/g $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF > y > ? > y > n > n > EOF diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] ? y - yes, discard this change n - no, skip this change e - edit this change manually s - skip remaining changes to this file f - discard remaining changes to this file d - done, skip remaining changes and files a - discard all changes to all remaining files q - quit, discarding no changes ? - ? (display help) discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b discard change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ hg st M f M folder1/g ? f.orig $ cat f a 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat f.orig 1 2 3 4 5 $ rm f.orig $ hg update -C . 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check editing files newly added by a revert 1) Create a dummy editor changing 1 to 42 $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh << '__EOF__' > cat "$1" | sed "s/1/42/g" > tt > mv tt "$1" > __EOF__ 2) Add k $ printf "1\n" > k $ hg add k $ hg commit -m "add k" 3) Use interactive revert with editing (replacing +1 with +42): $ printf "0\n2\n" > k $ HGEDITOR="\"sh\" \"${TESTTMP}/editor.sh\"" hg revert -i <<EOF > y > e > EOF reverting k diff --git a/k b/k 1 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ -1 +0 +2 discard this change to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] e $ cat k 42 $ hg update -C . 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg purge $ touch newfile $ hg add newfile $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > n > EOF forgetting newfile forget added file newfile (Yn)? n $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > y > EOF forgetting newfile forget added file newfile (Yn)? y $ hg status ? newfile When a line without EOL is selected during "revert -i" (issue5651) $ hg init $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol $ cd $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol $ echo 0 > a $ hg ci -qAm 0 $ printf 1 >> a $ hg ci -qAm 1 $ cat a 0 1 (no-eol) $ hg revert -ir'.^' <<EOF > y > y > EOF reverting a diff --git a/a b/a 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,2 +1,1 @@ 0 -1 \ No newline at end of file apply this change to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y $ cat a 0 When specified pattern does not exist, we should exit early (issue5789). $ hg files a $ hg rev b b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf $ hg rev -i b b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf $ cd ..