Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-issue612.t @ 14485:610873cf064a
Make pull -u behave like pull && update
Previously, pull would not update if new branch heads were received,
whereas pull && update would move to the tipmost branch head.
Also change the "crosses branches" abort in merge.update from
"crosses branches (merge branches or use --check to force update)"
to
"crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to force update)"
since it can no longer assume the user is running hg update.
author | Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 31 May 2011 11:52:22 -0700 |
parents | b63f6422d2a7 |
children | 9910f60a37ee |
line wrap: on
line source
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue612 $ hg init $ mkdir src $ echo a > src/a.c $ hg ci -Ama adding src/a.c $ hg mv src source moving src/a.c to source/a.c $ hg ci -Ammove $ hg co -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo new > src/a.c $ echo compiled > src/a.o $ hg ci -mupdate created new head $ hg status ? src/a.o $ hg merge merging src/a.c and source/a.c to source/a.c 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M source/a.c R src/a.c ? source/a.o