view tests/test-issue619.t @ 14485:610873cf064a

Make pull -u behave like pull && update Previously, pull would not update if new branch heads were received, whereas pull && update would move to the tipmost branch head. Also change the "crosses branches" abort in merge.update from "crosses branches (merge branches or use --check to force update)" to "crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to force update)" since it can no longer assume the user is running hg update.
author Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com>
date Tue, 31 May 2011 11:52:22 -0700
parents 1792b8a9422b
children 41885892796e
line wrap: on
line source

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue619

  $ hg init
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Ama
  adding a

  $ echo b > b
  $ hg branch b
  marked working directory as branch b
  $ hg ci -Amb
  adding b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Fast-forward:

  $ hg merge b
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -Ammerge

Bogus fast-forward should fail:

  $ hg merge b
  abort: merging with a working directory ancestor has no effect
  [255]