view tests/test-ancestor.py @ 23344:6333412245ec stable

mq: when setting message in plain mode, separate it from header (issue4453) Fix inconsistent handling of plain header separation in mq patcheader - and contrary to c87f2a5a6e49, do it in the direction of having an empty line between header and description. Plain patches are like mails and should thus have an empty line between headers and body in compliance with RFC 822 3.1.
author Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com>
date Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:57:40 +0100
parents 731b2a90983b
children 3a7d9c0c57a5
line wrap: on
line source

from mercurial import ancestor, commands, hg, ui, util

# graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph:
# o  13
# |
# | o  12
# | |
# | | o    11
# | | |\
# | | | | o  10
# | | | | |
# | o---+ |  9
# | | | | |
# o | | | |  8
#  / / / /
# | | o |  7
# | | | |
# o---+ |  6
#  / / /
# | | o  5
# | |/
# | o  4
# | |
# o |  3
# | |
# | o  2
# |/
# o  1
# |
# o  0

graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4],
         7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9],
         13: [8]}
pfunc = graph.get

class mockchangelog(object):
    parentrevs = graph.get

def runmissingancestors(revs, bases):
    print "%% ancestors of %s and not of %s" % (revs, bases)
    print ancestor.missingancestors(revs, bases, pfunc)

def test_missingancestors():
    # Empty revs
    runmissingancestors([], [1])
    runmissingancestors([], [])

    # If bases is empty, it's the same as if it were [nullrev]
    runmissingancestors([12], [])

    # Trivial case: revs == bases
    runmissingancestors([0], [0])
    runmissingancestors([4, 5, 6], [6, 5, 4])

    # With nullrev
    runmissingancestors([-1], [12])
    runmissingancestors([12], [-1])

    # 9 is a parent of 12. 7 is a parent of 9, so an ancestor of 12. 6 is an
    # ancestor of 12 but not of 7.
    runmissingancestors([12], [9])
    runmissingancestors([9], [12])
    runmissingancestors([12, 9], [7])
    runmissingancestors([7, 6], [12])

    # More complex cases
    runmissingancestors([10], [11, 12])
    runmissingancestors([11], [10])
    runmissingancestors([11], [10, 12])
    runmissingancestors([12], [10])
    runmissingancestors([12], [11])
    runmissingancestors([10, 11, 12], [13])
    runmissingancestors([13], [10, 11, 12])

def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False):
    print ("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" %
           (revs, stoprev, inclusive))
    return ancestor.lazyancestors(mockchangelog, revs, stoprev=stoprev,
                                  inclusive=inclusive)

def printlazyancestors(s, l):
    print [n for n in l if n in s]

def test_lazyancestors():
    # Empty revs
    s = genlazyancestors([])
    printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1])

    # Standard example
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13])
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Standard with ancestry in the initial set (1 is ancestor of 3)
    s = genlazyancestors([1, 3])
    printlazyancestors(s, [1, -1, 0])

    # Including revs
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Test with stoprev
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])


# The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of
# DAGs that have been known to be problematic.
dagtests = [
    '+2*2*2/*3/2',
    '+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2',
]
def test_gca():
    u = ui.ui()
    for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests):
        repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1)
        cl = repo.changelog
        if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'):
            # C version not available
            return

        commands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag)
        # Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not
        # include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make
        # sure both return exactly the same set of gcas.
        for a in cl:
            for b in cl:
                cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b))
                pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b))
                if cgcas != pygcas:
                    print "test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:" % (dag, a, b)
                    print "  C returned:      %s" % cgcas
                    print "  Python returned: %s" % pygcas

if __name__ == '__main__':
    test_missingancestors()
    test_lazyancestors()
    test_gca()