view tests/test-status-rev.t @ 23344:6333412245ec stable

mq: when setting message in plain mode, separate it from header (issue4453) Fix inconsistent handling of plain header separation in mq patcheader - and contrary to c87f2a5a6e49, do it in the direction of having an empty line between header and description. Plain patches are like mails and should thus have an empty line between headers and body in compliance with RFC 822 3.1.
author Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com>
date Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:57:40 +0100
parents eeaed3d2b004
children daa73289dd2a
line wrap: on
line source

Tests of 'hg status --rev <rev>' to make sure status between <rev> and '.' get
combined correctly with the dirstate status.

Sets up a history for a number of files where the filename describes the file's
history. The first two letters of the filename describe the first two commits;
the third letter describes the dirstate for the file. For example, a file called
'amr' was added in the first commit, modified in the second and then removed in
the dirstate.

These codes are used for commits:
x: does not exist
a: added
c: clean
m: modified
r: removed

These codes are used for dirstate:
d: in dirstate, but deleted from disk
f: removed from dirstate, but file exists (forgotten)
r: removed from dirstate and disk
q: added, but deleted from disk (q for q-rious?)
u: not in dirstate, but file exists (unknown)

  $ hg init
  $ touch .hgignore
  $ hg add .hgignore
  $ hg commit -m initial

First letter: first commit

  $ echo a >acc
  $ echo a >acd
  $ echo a >acf
  $ echo a >acm
  $ echo a >acr
  $ echo a >amc
  $ echo a >amd
  $ echo a >amf
  $ echo a >amm
  $ echo a >amr
  $ echo a >ara
  $ echo a >arq
  $ echo a >aru
  $ hg commit -Aqm first

Second letter: second commit

  $ echo b >xad
  $ echo b >xaf
  $ echo b >xam
  $ echo b >xar
  $ echo b >amc
  $ echo b >amd
  $ echo b >amf
  $ echo b >amm
  $ echo b >amr
  $ hg rm ara
  $ hg rm arq
  $ hg rm aru
  $ hg commit -Aqm second

Third letter: dirstate

  $ echo c >acm
  $ echo c >amm
  $ echo c >xam
  $ echo c >ara && hg add ara
  $ echo c >arq && hg add arq && rm arq
  $ echo c >aru
  $ hg rm amr
  $ hg rm acr
  $ hg rm xar
  $ rm acd
  $ rm amd
  $ rm xad
  $ hg forget acf
  $ hg forget amf
  $ hg forget xaf
  $ touch xxu

Status compared to one revision back

  $ hg status -A --rev 1 acc
  C acc
BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 acd
  ! acd
  C acd
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 acf
  R acf
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 acm
  M acm
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 acr
  R acr
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 amc
  M amc
BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 amd
  ! amd
  C amd
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 amf
  R amf
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 amm
  M amm
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 amr
  R amr
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 ara
  M ara
BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 arq
  R arq
  ! arq
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 aru
  R aru
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 xad
  ! xad
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 xaf
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 xam
  A xam
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 xar
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 xxu
  ? xxu

Status compared to two revisions back

  $ hg status -A --rev 0 acc
  A acc
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 acd
  ! acd
BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?')
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 acf
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 acm
  A acm
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 acr
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 amc
  A amc
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 amd
  ! amd
BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?')
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 amf
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 amm
  A amm
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 amr
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 ara
  A ara
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 arq
  ! arq
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 aru
  ? aru
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 xad
  ! xad
BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?')
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 xaf
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 xam
  A xam
  $ hg status -A --rev 0 xar