Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-status-rev.t @ 23344:6333412245ec stable
mq: when setting message in plain mode, separate it from header (issue4453)
Fix inconsistent handling of plain header separation in mq patcheader - and
contrary to c87f2a5a6e49, do it in the direction of having an empty line
between header and description. Plain patches are like mails and should thus
have an empty line between headers and body in compliance with RFC 822 3.1.
author | Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:57:40 +0100 |
parents | eeaed3d2b004 |
children | daa73289dd2a |
line wrap: on
line source
Tests of 'hg status --rev <rev>' to make sure status between <rev> and '.' get combined correctly with the dirstate status. Sets up a history for a number of files where the filename describes the file's history. The first two letters of the filename describe the first two commits; the third letter describes the dirstate for the file. For example, a file called 'amr' was added in the first commit, modified in the second and then removed in the dirstate. These codes are used for commits: x: does not exist a: added c: clean m: modified r: removed These codes are used for dirstate: d: in dirstate, but deleted from disk f: removed from dirstate, but file exists (forgotten) r: removed from dirstate and disk q: added, but deleted from disk (q for q-rious?) u: not in dirstate, but file exists (unknown) $ hg init $ touch .hgignore $ hg add .hgignore $ hg commit -m initial First letter: first commit $ echo a >acc $ echo a >acd $ echo a >acf $ echo a >acm $ echo a >acr $ echo a >amc $ echo a >amd $ echo a >amf $ echo a >amm $ echo a >amr $ echo a >ara $ echo a >arq $ echo a >aru $ hg commit -Aqm first Second letter: second commit $ echo b >xad $ echo b >xaf $ echo b >xam $ echo b >xar $ echo b >amc $ echo b >amd $ echo b >amf $ echo b >amm $ echo b >amr $ hg rm ara $ hg rm arq $ hg rm aru $ hg commit -Aqm second Third letter: dirstate $ echo c >acm $ echo c >amm $ echo c >xam $ echo c >ara && hg add ara $ echo c >arq && hg add arq && rm arq $ echo c >aru $ hg rm amr $ hg rm acr $ hg rm xar $ rm acd $ rm amd $ rm xad $ hg forget acf $ hg forget amf $ hg forget xaf $ touch xxu Status compared to one revision back $ hg status -A --rev 1 acc C acc BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!' $ hg status -A --rev 1 acd ! acd C acd $ hg status -A --rev 1 acf R acf $ hg status -A --rev 1 acm M acm $ hg status -A --rev 1 acr R acr $ hg status -A --rev 1 amc M amc BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!' $ hg status -A --rev 1 amd ! amd C amd $ hg status -A --rev 1 amf R amf $ hg status -A --rev 1 amm M amm $ hg status -A --rev 1 amr R amr $ hg status -A --rev 1 ara M ara BROKEN: file appears twice; should be '!' $ hg status -A --rev 1 arq R arq ! arq $ hg status -A --rev 1 aru R aru $ hg status -A --rev 1 xad ! xad $ hg status -A --rev 1 xaf $ hg status -A --rev 1 xam A xam $ hg status -A --rev 1 xar $ hg status -A --rev 1 xxu ? xxu Status compared to two revisions back $ hg status -A --rev 0 acc A acc $ hg status -A --rev 0 acd ! acd BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?') $ hg status -A --rev 0 acf $ hg status -A --rev 0 acm A acm $ hg status -A --rev 0 acr $ hg status -A --rev 0 amc A amc $ hg status -A --rev 0 amd ! amd BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?') $ hg status -A --rev 0 amf $ hg status -A --rev 0 amm A amm $ hg status -A --rev 0 amr $ hg status -A --rev 0 ara A ara $ hg status -A --rev 0 arq ! arq $ hg status -A --rev 0 aru ? aru $ hg status -A --rev 0 xad ! xad BROKEN: file exists, so should be listed (as '?') $ hg status -A --rev 0 xaf $ hg status -A --rev 0 xam A xam $ hg status -A --rev 0 xar