tests/test-merge-remove.t

lfs: autoload the extension when cloning from repo with lfs enabled

This is based on a patch by Gregory Szorc.  I made small adjustments to
clean up the messaging when the server has the extension enabled, but the
client has it disabled (to prevent autoloading).  Additionally, I added
a second server capability to distinguish between the server having the
extension enabled, and the server having LFS commits.  This helps prevent
unnecessary requirement propagation- the client shouldn't add a requirement
that the server doesn't have, just because the server had the extension
loaded.  The TODO I had about advertising a capability when the server can
natively serve up blobs isn't relevant anymore (we've had 2 releases that
support this), so I dropped it.

Currently, we lazily add the "lfs" requirement to a repo when we first
encounter LFS data. Due to a pretxnchangegroup hook that looks for LFS
data, this can happen at the end of clone.

Now that we have more control over how repositories are created, we can
do better.

This commit adds a repo creation option to add the "lfs" requirement.
hg.clone() sets this creation option if the remote peer is advertising
lfs usage (as opposed to just support needed to push).

So, what this change effectively does is have cloned repos
automatically inherit the "lfs" requirement.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5130

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'

  $ echo foo2 >> foo
  $ echo bleh > bar
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg mv foo foo1
  $ echo foo1 > foo1
  $ hg cat foo >> foo1
  $ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
  created new head

  $ hg merge
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  m   0         -2 unset               bar
  m   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -q
  M bar
  M foo1


Removing foo1 and bar:

  $ cp foo1 F
  $ cp bar B
  $ hg rm -f foo1 bar

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  r   0         -1 set                 bar
  r   0         -1 set                 foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  R bar
  R foo1


Re-adding foo1 and bar:

  $ cp F foo1
  $ cp B bar
  $ hg add -v foo1 bar
  adding bar
  adding foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo


Reverting foo1 and bar:

  $ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
  saving current version of bar as bar.orig
  saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
  reverting bar
  reverting foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo

  $ hg diff

Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove

  $ rm *
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg rm bar
  $ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
  $ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
  $ hg merge
  bar: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat bar
  memories of buried pirate treasure

Those who use force will lose

  $ hg merge -f
  file 'bar' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
  What do you want to do?
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ cat bar
  bleh
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M foo1