Mercurial > hg
view rust/hg-core/src/discovery.rs @ 49894:678588b01af1
rhg: implement checkexec to support weird filesystems
In particular, some of our repos are stored on a fileserver that simulates
POSIX permissions poorly, in such a way that prevents the removal
of execute permission.
This causes rhg show a spurious unclean status, even though python
hg reports the repo as clean.
We fix this by making rhg implement the ~same checkexec logic
that python hg does.
author | Arseniy Alekseyev <aalekseyev@janestreet.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 05 Jan 2023 17:15:03 +0000 |
parents | 26114bd6ec60 |
children | e98fd81bb151 |
line wrap: on
line source
// discovery.rs // // Copyright 2019 Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> // // This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the // GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version. //! Discovery operations //! //! This is a Rust counterpart to the `partialdiscovery` class of //! `mercurial.setdiscovery` use super::{Graph, GraphError, Revision, NULL_REVISION}; use crate::{ancestors::MissingAncestors, dagops, FastHashMap}; use rand::seq::SliceRandom; use rand::{thread_rng, RngCore, SeedableRng}; use std::cmp::{max, min}; use std::collections::{HashSet, VecDeque}; type Rng = rand_pcg::Pcg32; type Seed = [u8; 16]; pub struct PartialDiscovery<G: Graph + Clone> { target_heads: Option<Vec<Revision>>, graph: G, // plays the role of self._repo common: MissingAncestors<G>, undecided: Option<HashSet<Revision>>, children_cache: Option<FastHashMap<Revision, Vec<Revision>>>, missing: HashSet<Revision>, rng: Rng, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, } pub struct DiscoveryStats { pub undecided: Option<usize>, } /// Update an existing sample to match the expected size /// /// The sample is updated with revisions exponentially distant from each /// element of `heads`. /// /// If a target size is specified, the sampling will stop once this size is /// reached. Otherwise sampling will happen until roots of the <revs> set are /// reached. /// /// - `revs`: set of revs we want to discover (if None, `assume` the whole dag /// represented by `parentfn` /// - `heads`: set of DAG head revs /// - `sample`: a sample to update /// - `parentfn`: a callable to resolve parents for a revision /// - `quicksamplesize`: optional target size of the sample fn update_sample<I>( revs: Option<&HashSet<Revision>>, heads: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, sample: &mut HashSet<Revision>, parentsfn: impl Fn(Revision) -> Result<I, GraphError>, quicksamplesize: Option<usize>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> where I: Iterator<Item = Revision>, { let mut distances: FastHashMap<Revision, u32> = FastHashMap::default(); let mut visit: VecDeque<Revision> = heads.into_iter().collect(); let mut factor: u32 = 1; let mut seen: HashSet<Revision> = HashSet::new(); while let Some(current) = visit.pop_front() { if !seen.insert(current) { continue; } let d = *distances.entry(current).or_insert(1); if d > factor { factor *= 2; } if d == factor { sample.insert(current); if let Some(sz) = quicksamplesize { if sample.len() >= sz { return Ok(()); } } } for p in parentsfn(current)? { if let Some(revs) = revs { if !revs.contains(&p) { continue; } } distances.entry(p).or_insert(d + 1); visit.push_back(p); } } Ok(()) } struct ParentsIterator { parents: [Revision; 2], cur: usize, } impl ParentsIterator { fn graph_parents( graph: &impl Graph, r: Revision, ) -> Result<ParentsIterator, GraphError> { Ok(ParentsIterator { parents: graph.parents(r)?, cur: 0, }) } } impl Iterator for ParentsIterator { type Item = Revision; fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Revision> { if self.cur > 1 { return None; } let rev = self.parents[self.cur]; self.cur += 1; if rev == NULL_REVISION { return self.next(); } Some(rev) } } impl<G: Graph + Clone> PartialDiscovery<G> { /// Create a PartialDiscovery object, with the intent /// of comparing our `::<target_heads>` revset to the contents of another /// repo. /// /// For now `target_heads` is passed as a vector, and will be used /// at the first call to `ensure_undecided()`. /// /// If we want to make the signature more flexible, /// we'll have to make it a type argument of `PartialDiscovery` or a trait /// object since we'll keep it in the meanwhile /// /// The `respect_size` boolean controls how the sampling methods /// will interpret the size argument requested by the caller. If it's /// `false`, they are allowed to produce a sample whose size is more /// appropriate to the situation (typically bigger). /// /// The `randomize` boolean affects sampling, and specifically how /// limiting or last-minute expanding is been done: /// /// If `true`, both will perform random picking from `self.undecided`. /// This is currently the best for actual discoveries. /// /// If `false`, a reproductible picking strategy is performed. This is /// useful for integration tests. pub fn new( graph: G, target_heads: Vec<Revision>, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, ) -> Self { let mut seed = [0; 16]; if randomize { thread_rng().fill_bytes(&mut seed); } Self::new_with_seed(graph, target_heads, seed, respect_size, randomize) } pub fn new_with_seed( graph: G, target_heads: Vec<Revision>, seed: Seed, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, ) -> Self { PartialDiscovery { undecided: None, children_cache: None, target_heads: Some(target_heads), graph: graph.clone(), common: MissingAncestors::new(graph, vec![]), missing: HashSet::new(), rng: Rng::from_seed(seed), respect_size, randomize, } } /// Extract at most `size` random elements from sample and return them /// as a vector fn limit_sample( &mut self, mut sample: Vec<Revision>, size: usize, ) -> Vec<Revision> { if !self.randomize { sample.sort(); sample.truncate(size); return sample; } let sample_len = sample.len(); if sample_len <= size { return sample; } let rng = &mut self.rng; let dropped_size = sample_len - size; let limited_slice = if size < dropped_size { sample.partial_shuffle(rng, size).0 } else { sample.partial_shuffle(rng, dropped_size).1 }; limited_slice.to_owned() } /// Register revisions known as being common pub fn add_common_revisions( &mut self, common: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> { let before_len = self.common.get_bases().len(); self.common.add_bases(common); if self.common.get_bases().len() == before_len { return Ok(()); } if let Some(ref mut undecided) = self.undecided { self.common.remove_ancestors_from(undecided)?; } Ok(()) } /// Register revisions known as being missing /// /// # Performance note /// /// Except in the most trivial case, the first call of this method has /// the side effect of computing `self.undecided` set for the first time, /// and the related caches it might need for efficiency of its internal /// computation. This is typically faster if more information is /// available in `self.common`. Therefore, for good performance, the /// caller should avoid calling this too early. pub fn add_missing_revisions( &mut self, missing: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut tovisit: VecDeque<Revision> = missing.into_iter().collect(); if tovisit.is_empty() { return Ok(()); } self.ensure_children_cache()?; self.ensure_undecided()?; // for safety of possible future refactors let children = self.children_cache.as_ref().unwrap(); let mut seen: HashSet<Revision> = HashSet::new(); let undecided_mut = self.undecided.as_mut().unwrap(); while let Some(rev) = tovisit.pop_front() { if !self.missing.insert(rev) { // either it's known to be missing from a previous // invocation, and there's no need to iterate on its // children (we now they are all missing) // or it's from a previous iteration of this loop // and its children have already been queued continue; } undecided_mut.remove(&rev); match children.get(&rev) { None => { continue; } Some(this_children) => { for child in this_children.iter().cloned() { if seen.insert(child) { tovisit.push_back(child); } } } } } Ok(()) } /// Do we have any information about the peer? pub fn has_info(&self) -> bool { self.common.has_bases() } /// Did we acquire full knowledge of our Revisions that the peer has? pub fn is_complete(&self) -> bool { self.undecided.as_ref().map_or(false, HashSet::is_empty) } /// Return the heads of the currently known common set of revisions. /// /// If the discovery process is not complete (see `is_complete()`), the /// caller must be aware that this is an intermediate state. /// /// On the other hand, if it is complete, then this is currently /// the only way to retrieve the end results of the discovery process. /// /// We may introduce in the future an `into_common_heads` call that /// would be more appropriate for normal Rust callers, dropping `self` /// if it is complete. pub fn common_heads(&self) -> Result<HashSet<Revision>, GraphError> { self.common.bases_heads() } /// Force first computation of `self.undecided` /// /// After this, `self.undecided.as_ref()` and `.as_mut()` can be /// unwrapped to get workable immutable or mutable references without /// any panic. /// /// This is an imperative call instead of an access with added lazyness /// to reduce easily the scope of mutable borrow for the caller, /// compared to undecided(&'a mut self) -> &'a… that would keep it /// as long as the resulting immutable one. fn ensure_undecided(&mut self) -> Result<(), GraphError> { if self.undecided.is_some() { return Ok(()); } let tgt = self.target_heads.take().unwrap(); self.undecided = Some(self.common.missing_ancestors(tgt)?.into_iter().collect()); Ok(()) } fn ensure_children_cache(&mut self) -> Result<(), GraphError> { if self.children_cache.is_some() { return Ok(()); } self.ensure_undecided()?; let mut children: FastHashMap<Revision, Vec<Revision>> = FastHashMap::default(); for &rev in self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap() { for p in ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, rev)? { children.entry(p).or_insert_with(Vec::new).push(rev); } } self.children_cache = Some(children); Ok(()) } /// Provide statistics about the current state of the discovery process pub fn stats(&self) -> DiscoveryStats { DiscoveryStats { undecided: self.undecided.as_ref().map(HashSet::len), } } pub fn take_quick_sample( &mut self, headrevs: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, size: usize, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { self.ensure_undecided()?; let mut sample = { let undecided = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); if undecided.len() <= size { return Ok(undecided.iter().cloned().collect()); } dagops::heads(&self.graph, undecided.iter())? }; if sample.len() >= size { return Ok(self.limit_sample(sample.into_iter().collect(), size)); } update_sample( None, headrevs, &mut sample, |r| ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, r), Some(size), )?; Ok(sample.into_iter().collect()) } /// Extract a sample from `self.undecided`, going from its heads and roots. /// /// The `size` parameter is used to avoid useless computations if /// it turns out to be bigger than the whole set of undecided Revisions. /// /// The sample is taken by using `update_sample` from the heads, then /// from the roots, working on the reverse DAG, /// expressed by `self.children_cache`. /// /// No effort is being made to complete or limit the sample to `size` /// but this method returns another interesting size that it derives /// from its knowledge of the structure of the various sets, leaving /// to the caller the decision to use it or not. fn bidirectional_sample( &mut self, size: usize, ) -> Result<(HashSet<Revision>, usize), GraphError> { self.ensure_undecided()?; { // we don't want to compute children_cache before this // but doing it after extracting self.undecided takes a mutable // ref to self while a shareable one is still active. let undecided = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); if undecided.len() <= size { return Ok((undecided.clone(), size)); } } self.ensure_children_cache()?; let revs = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); let mut sample: HashSet<Revision> = revs.clone(); // it's possible that leveraging the children cache would be more // efficient here dagops::retain_heads(&self.graph, &mut sample)?; let revsheads = sample.clone(); // was again heads(revs) in python // update from heads update_sample( Some(revs), revsheads.iter().cloned(), &mut sample, |r| ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, r), None, )?; // update from roots let revroots: HashSet<Revision> = dagops::roots(&self.graph, revs)?.into_iter().collect(); let prescribed_size = max(size, min(revroots.len(), revsheads.len())); let children = self.children_cache.as_ref().unwrap(); let empty_vec: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new(); update_sample( Some(revs), revroots, &mut sample, |r| Ok(children.get(&r).unwrap_or(&empty_vec).iter().cloned()), None, )?; Ok((sample, prescribed_size)) } /// Fill up sample up to the wished size with random undecided Revisions. /// /// This is intended to be used as a last resort completion if the /// regular sampling algorithm returns too few elements. fn random_complete_sample( &mut self, sample: &mut Vec<Revision>, size: usize, ) { let sample_len = sample.len(); if size <= sample_len { return; } let take_from: Vec<Revision> = self .undecided .as_ref() .unwrap() .iter() .filter(|&r| !sample.contains(r)) .cloned() .collect(); sample.extend(self.limit_sample(take_from, size - sample_len)); } pub fn take_full_sample( &mut self, size: usize, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { let (sample_set, prescribed_size) = self.bidirectional_sample(size)?; let size = if self.respect_size { size } else { prescribed_size }; let mut sample = self.limit_sample(sample_set.into_iter().collect(), size); self.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, size); Ok(sample) } } #[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; use crate::testing::SampleGraph; /// A PartialDiscovery as for pushing all the heads of `SampleGraph` /// /// To avoid actual randomness in these tests, we give it a fixed /// random seed, but by default we'll test the random version. fn full_disco() -> PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph> { PartialDiscovery::new_with_seed( SampleGraph, vec![10, 11, 12, 13], [0; 16], true, true, ) } /// A PartialDiscovery as for pushing the 12 head of `SampleGraph` /// /// To avoid actual randomness in tests, we give it a fixed random seed. fn disco12() -> PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph> { PartialDiscovery::new_with_seed( SampleGraph, vec![12], [0; 16], true, true, ) } fn sorted_undecided( disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>, ) -> Vec<Revision> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.undecided.as_ref().unwrap().iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); as_vec } fn sorted_missing(disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>) -> Vec<Revision> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.missing.iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); as_vec } fn sorted_common_heads( disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.common_heads()?.iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); Ok(as_vec) } #[test] fn test_add_common_get_undecided() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); assert_eq!(disco.undecided, None); assert!(!disco.has_info()); assert_eq!(disco.stats().undecided, None); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![11, 12])?; assert!(disco.has_info()); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); assert!(disco.missing.is_empty()); // add_common_revisions did not trigger a premature computation // of `undecided`, let's check that and ask for them assert_eq!(disco.undecided, None); disco.ensure_undecided()?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5, 8, 10, 13]); assert_eq!(disco.stats().undecided, Some(4)); Ok(()) } /// in this test, we pretend that our peer misses exactly (8+10):: /// and we're comparing all our repo to it (as in a bare push) #[test] fn test_discovery() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![11, 12])?; disco.add_missing_revisions(vec![8, 10])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![8, 10, 13]); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![5])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![8, 10, 13]); assert!(disco.is_complete()); assert_eq!(sorted_common_heads(&disco)?, vec![5, 11, 12]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_add_missing_early_continue() -> Result<(), GraphError> { eprintln!("test_add_missing_early_stop"); let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![13, 3, 4])?; disco.ensure_children_cache()?; // 12 is grand-child of 6 through 9 // passing them in this order maximizes the chances of the // early continue to do the wrong thing disco.add_missing_revisions(vec![6, 9, 12])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5, 7, 10, 11]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![6, 9, 12]); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_no_need_to() { let sample = vec![1, 2, 3, 4]; assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample(sample, 10), vec![1, 2, 3, 4]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_less_than_half() { assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample((1..6).collect(), 2), vec![2, 5]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_more_than_half() { assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample((1..4).collect(), 2), vec![1, 2]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_no_random() { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.randomize = false; assert_eq!( disco.limit_sample(vec![1, 8, 13, 5, 7, 3], 4), vec![1, 3, 5, 7] ); } #[test] fn test_quick_sample_enough_undecided_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.undecided = Some((1..=13).collect()); let mut sample_vec = disco.take_quick_sample(vec![], 4)?; sample_vec.sort(); assert_eq!(sample_vec, vec![10, 11, 12, 13]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_quick_sample_climbing_from_12() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = disco12(); disco.ensure_undecided()?; let mut sample_vec = disco.take_quick_sample(vec![12], 4)?; sample_vec.sort(); // r12's only parent is r9, whose unique grand-parent through the // diamond shape is r4. This ends there because the distance from r4 // to the root is only 3. assert_eq!(sample_vec, vec![4, 9, 12]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_children_cache() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.ensure_children_cache()?; let cache = disco.children_cache.unwrap(); assert_eq!(cache.get(&2).cloned(), Some(vec![4])); assert_eq!(cache.get(&10).cloned(), None); let mut children_4 = cache.get(&4).cloned().unwrap(); children_4.sort(); assert_eq!(children_4, vec![5, 6, 7]); let mut children_7 = cache.get(&7).cloned().unwrap(); children_7.sort(); assert_eq!(children_7, vec![9, 11]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_complete_sample() { let mut disco = full_disco(); let undecided: HashSet<Revision> = [4, 7, 9, 2, 3].iter().cloned().collect(); disco.undecided = Some(undecided); let mut sample = vec![0]; disco.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, 3); assert_eq!(sample.len(), 3); let mut sample = vec![2, 4, 7]; disco.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, 1); assert_eq!(sample.len(), 3); } #[test] fn test_bidirectional_sample() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.undecided = Some((0..=13).into_iter().collect()); let (sample_set, size) = disco.bidirectional_sample(7)?; assert_eq!(size, 7); let mut sample: Vec<Revision> = sample_set.into_iter().collect(); sample.sort(); // our DAG is a bit too small for the results to be really interesting // at least it shows that // - we went both ways // - we didn't take all Revisions (6 is not in the sample) assert_eq!(sample, vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]); Ok(()) } }