Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-issue522.t @ 31793:69d8fcf20014
help: document bundle specifications
I softly formalized the concept of a "bundle specification" a while
ago when I was working on clone bundles and stream clone bundles and
wanted a more robust way to define what exactly is in a bundle file.
The concept has existed for a while. Since it is part of the clone
bundles feature and exposed to the user via the "-t" argument to
`hg bundle`, it is something we need to support for the long haul.
After the 4.1 release, I heard a few people comment that they didn't
realize you could generate zstd bundles with `hg bundle`. I'm
partially to blame for not documenting it in bundle's docstring.
Additionally, I added a hacky, experimental feature for controlling
the compression level of bundles in 76104a4899ad. As the commit
message says, I went with a quick and dirty solution out of time
constraints. Furthermore, I wanted to eventually store this
configuration in the "bundlespec" so it could be made more flexible.
Given:
a) bundlespecs are here to stay
b) we don't have great documentation over what they are, despite being
a user-facing feature
c) the list of available compression engines and their behavior isn't
exposed
d) we need an extensible place to modify behavior of compression
engines
I want to move forward with formalizing bundlespecs as a user-facing
feature. This commit does that by introducing a "bundlespec" help
page. Leaning on the just-added compression engine documentation
and API, the topic also conveniently lists available compression
engines and details about them. This makes features like zstd
bundle compression more discoverable. e.g. you can now
`hg help -k zstd` and it lists the "bundlespec" topic.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 01 Apr 2017 13:42:06 -0700 |
parents | 2fc86d92c4a9 |
children | 009d0283de5f |
line wrap: on
line source
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/522 In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge revision. $ hg init $ echo foo > foo $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo' $ echo bar >> foo $ hg ci -m 'change foo' $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo' reverting foo changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e $ hg up -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ touch bar $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar' $ hg merge --debug searching for copies back to rev 1 unmatched files in local: bar resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee foo: remote is newer -> g getting foo 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg debugstate | grep foo m 0 -2 unset foo $ hg st -A foo M foo $ hg ci -m 'merge' $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644 foo $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 5 ..... 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 5 9 ..... 1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re) 2 14 5 ..... 2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)