view tests/test-logtoprocess.t @ 31793:69d8fcf20014

help: document bundle specifications I softly formalized the concept of a "bundle specification" a while ago when I was working on clone bundles and stream clone bundles and wanted a more robust way to define what exactly is in a bundle file. The concept has existed for a while. Since it is part of the clone bundles feature and exposed to the user via the "-t" argument to `hg bundle`, it is something we need to support for the long haul. After the 4.1 release, I heard a few people comment that they didn't realize you could generate zstd bundles with `hg bundle`. I'm partially to blame for not documenting it in bundle's docstring. Additionally, I added a hacky, experimental feature for controlling the compression level of bundles in 76104a4899ad. As the commit message says, I went with a quick and dirty solution out of time constraints. Furthermore, I wanted to eventually store this configuration in the "bundlespec" so it could be made more flexible. Given: a) bundlespecs are here to stay b) we don't have great documentation over what they are, despite being a user-facing feature c) the list of available compression engines and their behavior isn't exposed d) we need an extensible place to modify behavior of compression engines I want to move forward with formalizing bundlespecs as a user-facing feature. This commit does that by introducing a "bundlespec" help page. Leaning on the just-added compression engine documentation and API, the topic also conveniently lists available compression engines and details about them. This makes features like zstd bundle compression more discoverable. e.g. you can now `hg help -k zstd` and it lists the "bundlespec" topic.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Sat, 01 Apr 2017 13:42:06 -0700
parents 3844b3299a53
children 46ba2cdda476
line wrap: on
line source

ATTENTION: logtoprocess runs commands asynchronously. Be sure to append "| cat"
to hg commands, to wait for the output, if you want to test its output.
Otherwise the test will be flaky.

Test if logtoprocess correctly captures command-related log calls.

  $ hg init
  $ cat > $TESTTMP/foocommand.py << EOF
  > from mercurial import cmdutil
  > from time import sleep
  > cmdtable = {}
  > command = cmdutil.command(cmdtable)
  > @command('foo', [])
  > def foo(ui, repo):
  >     ui.log('foo', 'a message: %(bar)s\n', bar='spam')
  > EOF
  $ cp $HGRCPATH $HGRCPATH.bak
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
  > [extensions]
  > logtoprocess=
  > foocommand=$TESTTMP/foocommand.py
  > [logtoprocess]
  > command=echo 'logtoprocess command output:';
  >     echo "\$EVENT";
  >     echo "\$MSG1";
  >     echo "\$MSG2"
  > commandfinish=echo 'logtoprocess commandfinish output:';
  >     echo "\$EVENT";
  >     echo "\$MSG1";
  >     echo "\$MSG2";
  >     echo "\$MSG3"
  > foo=echo 'logtoprocess foo output:';
  >     echo "\$EVENT";
  >     echo "\$MSG1";
  >     echo "\$OPT_BAR"
  > EOF

Running a command triggers both a ui.log('command') and a
ui.log('commandfinish') call. The foo command also uses ui.log.

Use sort to avoid ordering issues between the various processes we spawn:
  $ hg foo | cat | sort
  
  
  
  0
  a message: spam
  command
  commandfinish
  foo
  foo
  foo
  foo
  foo exited 0 after * seconds (glob)
  logtoprocess command output:
  logtoprocess commandfinish output:
  logtoprocess foo output:
  spam

Confirm that logging blocked time catches stdio properly:
  $ cp $HGRCPATH.bak $HGRCPATH
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
  > [extensions]
  > logtoprocess=
  > pager=
  > [logtoprocess]
  > uiblocked=echo "\$EVENT stdio \$OPT_STDIO_BLOCKED ms command \$OPT_COMMAND_DURATION ms"
  > [ui]
  > logblockedtimes=True
  > EOF

  $ hg log | cat
  uiblocked stdio [0-9]+.[0-9]* ms command [0-9]+.[0-9]* ms (re)