view tests/test-patch-offset.t @ 31793:69d8fcf20014

help: document bundle specifications

I softly formalized the concept of a "bundle specification" a while
ago when I was working on clone bundles and stream clone bundles and
wanted a more robust way to define what exactly is in a bundle file.

The concept has existed for a while. Since it is part of the clone
bundles feature and exposed to the user via the "-t" argument to
`hg bundle`, it is something we need to support for the long haul.

After the 4.1 release, I heard a few people comment that they didn't
realize you could generate zstd bundles with `hg bundle`. I'm
partially to blame for not documenting it in bundle's docstring.

Additionally, I added a hacky, experimental feature for controlling
the compression level of bundles in 76104a4899ad. As the commit
message says, I went with a quick and dirty solution out of time
constraints. Furthermore, I wanted to eventually store this
configuration in the "bundlespec" so it could be made more flexible.

Given:

a) bundlespecs are here to stay
b) we don't have great documentation over what they are, despite being
   a user-facing feature
c) the list of available compression engines and their behavior isn't
   exposed
d) we need an extensible place to modify behavior of compression
   engines

I want to move forward with formalizing bundlespecs as a user-facing
feature. This commit does that by introducing a "bundlespec" help
page. Leaning on the just-added compression engine documentation
and API, the topic also conveniently lists available compression
engines and details about them. This makes features like zstd
bundle compression more discoverable. e.g. you can now
`hg help -k zstd` and it lists the "bundlespec" topic.

  $ cat > writepatterns.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > 
  > path = sys.argv[1]
  > patterns = sys.argv[2:]
  > 
  > fp = file(path, 'wb')
  > for pattern in patterns:
  >     count = int(pattern[0:-1])
  >     char = pattern[-1] + '\n'
  >     fp.write(char*count)
  > fp.close()
  > EOF

prepare repo

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

These initial lines of Xs were not in the original file used to generate
the patch.  So all the patch hunks need to be applied to a constant offset
within this file.  If the offset isn't tracked then the hunks can be
applied to the wrong lines of this file.

  $ python ../writepatterns.py a 34X 10A 1B 10A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 10A 1E 10A 1B 10A
  $ hg commit -Am adda
  adding a

This is a cleaner patch generated via diff
In this case it reproduces the problem when
the output of hg export does not
import patch

  $ hg import -v -m 'b' -d '2 0' - <<EOF
  > --- a/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > +++ b/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > EOF
  applying patch from stdin
  patching file a
  Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #3 succeeded at 109 (offset 34 lines).
  committing files:
  a
  committing manifest
  committing changelog
  created 189885cecb41

compare imported changes against reference file

  $ python ../writepatterns.py aref 34X 10A 1B 1a 9A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 1a 9A 1E 10A 1B 1a 9A
  $ diff aref a

  $ cd ..