view tests/test-merge4.t @ 37632:6c55ce51d6c3

largefiles: use command executor for batch operation

This is the only other user of iterbatch() in core.

Tests changed because the new command executor is smart enough
to not send a "batch" command over the wire if only 1 command
was requested.

There is still coverage for the "batch" command in this test
though.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3270

  $ hg init
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #1"
  $ hg update 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo This is file c1 > c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg commit -m "commit #2"
  created new head
  $ hg merge 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ rm b
  $ echo This is file c22 > c

Test hg behaves when committing with a missing file added by a merge

  $ hg commit -m "commit #3"
  abort: cannot commit merge with missing files
  [255]