view mercurial/help/pager.txt @ 33171:6d678ab1b10d

revlog: C implementation of delta chain resolution I've seen revlog._deltachain() appear in a number of performance profiles. I suspect there are 2 reasons for this: 1. Delta chain resolution performs many index lookups, thus triggering population of index tuples. Creating possibly tens of thousands of PyObject will have overhead. 2. Delta chain resolution is a tight loop. By moving delta chain resolution to C, we can defer instantiation of full index entry tuples and make the loop faster courtesy of not running in Python. We can measure the impact to delta chain resolution via `hg perflogrevision` using the mozilla-central repo with a recent manifest having delta chain length of 33726: $ hg perfrevlogrevision -m 364895 ! full ! wall 0.367585 comb 0.370000 user 0.340000 sys 0.030000 (best of 27) ! wall 0.357581 comb 0.360000 user 0.350000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! deltachain ! wall 0.010644 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 270) ! wall 0.000292 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 8729) $ hg perfrevlogrevision --cache -m 364895 ! deltachain ! wall 0.003904 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 712) ! wall 0.000284 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9926) The first test measures savings from both not instantiating index entries and moving to C. The second test (which doesn't clear the index caches) essentially isolates the benefits of moving from Python to C. It still shows a 13.7x speedup (versus 36.4x). And there are multiple milliseconds of savings within the critical path for resolving revision data. I think that justifies the existence of C code. A more striking example of the benefits of this change can be demonstrated by timing `hg debugdeltachain -m` for the mozilla-central repo: $ time hg debugdeltachain -m > /dev/null before: 1057.4s after: 503.3s PyPy2.7 5.8.0: 220.0s It's worth noting that the C code isn't as optimal as it could be. We're still instantiating a new PyObject for every revision. A future optimization would be to reuse the PyObject on the cached index tuple. We could potentially also get wins by using a memory array of raw integers. There is also room for a delta chain cache on revlog instances. Of course, the best optimization is to implement revlog reading outside of Python so Python doesn't need to be concerned about the relatively expensive index entries and operations on them.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:41:34 -0700
parents 85b978031a75
children
line wrap: on
line source

Some Mercurial commands can produce a lot of output, and Mercurial will
attempt to use a pager to make those commands more pleasant.

To set the pager that should be used, set the application variable::

  [pager]
  pager = less -FRX

If no pager is set in the user or repository configuration, Mercurial uses the
environment variable $PAGER. If $PAGER is not set, pager.pager from the default
or system configuration is used. If none of these are set, a default pager will
be used, typically `less` on Unix and `more` on Windows.

.. container:: windows

  On Windows, `more` is not color aware, so using it effectively disables color.
  MSYS and Cygwin shells provide `less` as a pager, which can be configured to
  support ANSI color codes.  See :hg:`help config.color.pagermode` to configure
  the color mode when invoking a pager.

You can disable the pager for certain commands by adding them to the
pager.ignore list::

  [pager]
  ignore = version, help, update

To ignore global commands like :hg:`version` or :hg:`help`, you have
to specify them in your user configuration file.

To control whether the pager is used at all for an individual command,
you can use --pager=<value>:

  - use as needed: `auto`.
  - require the pager: `yes` or `on`.
  - suppress the pager: `no` or `off` (any unrecognized value
    will also work).

To globally turn off all attempts to use a pager, set::

  [ui]
  paginate = never

which will prevent the pager from running.