view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 35741:73432eee0ac4

fileset: add kind:pat operator ":" isn't taken as a symbol character but an infix operator so we can write e.g. "path:'foo bar'" as well as "'path:foo bar'". An invalid pattern kind is rejected in the former form as we know a kind is specified explicitly. The binding strength is copied from "x:y" range operator of revset. Perhaps it can be adjusted later if we want to parse "foo:bar()" as "(foo:bar)()", not "foo:(bar())". We can also add "kind:" postfix operator if we want. One possible confusion is that the scope of the leading "set:" vs "kind:pat" operator. The former is consumed by a matcher so applies to the whole fileset expression: $ hg files 'set:foo() or kind:bar or baz' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Whereas the scope of kind:pat operator is narrow: $ hg files 'set:foo() or kind:bar or baz' ^^^
author Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org>
date Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:29:15 +0900
parents fc1d75e7a98d
children cb70501d8b71
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

  $ hg revert --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a back to normal:

  $ hg status
  ? b

  $ rm b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-a > a
  $ hg commit -m "2a"

  $ hg co -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-b > a
  $ hg commit -m "2b"
  created new head

  $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1
  merging a
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ rm a
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

Revert should fail:

  $ hg revert
  abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified
  (use 'hg update' or see 'hg help revert')
  [255]

Revert should be ok now:

  $ hg revert -r2 --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged):

  $ hg status
  M a
  ? b

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b