view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 29954:769aee32fae0

strip: don't use "full" and "partial" to describe bundles

The partial bundle is not a subset of the full bundle, and the full
bundle is not full in any way that i see. The most obvious
interpretation of "full" I can think of is that it has all commits
back to the null revision, but that is not what the "full" bundle
is. The "full" bundle is simply a backup of what the user asked us to
strip (unless --no-backup). The "partial" bundle contains the
revisions we temporarily stripped because they had higher revision
numbers that some commit that the user asked us to strip.

The "full" bundle is already called "backup" in the code, so let's use
that in user-facing messages too. Let's call the "partial" bundle
"temporary" in the code.

Revert interactive tests
1 add and commit file f
2 add commit file folder1/g
3 add and commit file folder2/h
4 add and commit file folder1/i
5 commit change to file f
6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and
9 make workdir match 7
10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > interactive = true
  > [extensions]
  > record =
  > purge = 
  > EOF


  $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2
  $ cd a
  $ hg init
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n")
  $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f"
  $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g"
  $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h"
  $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i"
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying f"
  >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g"
  >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h"
  $ hg tip
  changeset:   6:59dd6e4ab63a
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     modifying folder2/h
  
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  removing folder1/i (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  +a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  revert change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  +b
  revert change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  +c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  revert change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  +d
  revert change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f

Test that --interactive lift the need for --all

  $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q
  
  abort: user quit
  [255]
  $ ls folder1/
  g

Test that a noop revert doesn't do an unecessary backup
  $ (echo y; echo n) | hg revert -i -r 2 folder1/g
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
   3
   4
   5
  +d
  revert this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ ls folder1/
  g

Test --no-backup
  $ (echo y; echo y) | hg revert -i -C -r 2 folder1/g
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
   3
   4
   5
  +d
  revert this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  $ ls folder1/
  g
  >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n")


  $ hg update -C 6
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  removing folder1/i (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  +a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  revert change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  +b
  revert change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  +c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  revert change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  +d
  revert change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  R folder1/i
  $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  discard change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  R folder1/i
  ? f.orig
  $ cat f
  a
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat f.orig
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ rm f.orig
  $ hg update -C .
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Check editing files newly added by a revert

1) Create a dummy editor changing 1 to 42
  $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh << '__EOF__'
  > cat "$1"  | sed "s/1/42/g"  > tt
  > mv tt  "$1"
  > __EOF__

2) Add k
  $ printf "1\n" > k
  $ hg add k
  $ hg commit -m "add k"

3) Use interactive revert with editing (replacing +1 with +42):
  $ printf "0\n2\n" > k
  $ HGEDITOR="\"sh\" \"${TESTTMP}/editor.sh\"" hg revert -i  <<EOF
  > y
  > e
  > EOF
  reverting k
  diff --git a/k b/k
  1 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
  -1
  +0
  +2
  discard this change to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] e
  
  $ cat k
  42

Check the experimental config to invert the selection:
  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [experimental]
  > revertalternateinteractivemode=False
  > EOF


  $ hg up -C .
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ printf 'firstline\nc\n1\n2\n3\n 3\n5\nd\nlastline\n' > folder1/g
  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r a3d963a027aa folder1/g
  --- a/folder1/g
  +++ b/folder1/g
  @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
  +firstline
   c
   1
   2
   3
  -4
  + 3
   5
   d
  +lastline
  $ hg revert -i <<EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  3 hunks, 3 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
  -firstline
   c
   1
   2
   3
  discard change 1/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,7 +1,7 @@
   c
   1
   2
   3
  - 3
  +4
   5
   d
  discard change 2/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -7,3 +6,2 @@
   5
   d
  -lastline
  discard change 3/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r a3d963a027aa folder1/g
  --- a/folder1/g
  +++ b/folder1/g
  @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
   4
   5
   d
  +lastline

  $ hg update -C .
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg purge
  $ touch newfile
  $ hg add newfile
  $ hg status
  A newfile
  $ hg revert -i <<EOF
  > n
  > EOF
  forgetting newfile
  forget added file newfile (yn)? n
  $ hg status
  A newfile
  $ hg revert -i <<EOF
  > y
  > EOF
  forgetting newfile
  forget added file newfile (yn)? y
  $ hg status
  ? newfile