Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-changelog-exec.t @ 47010:76ae43d5b1db stable
repoview: fix memory leak of filtered repo classes
The leak occurs in long-running server processes with
extensions, and is measured at 110kB per request.
Before this change, the contents of the `_filteredrepotypes`
cache are not properly garbage collected, despite it begin
a `WeakKeyDictionary`.
Extensions have a tendency to generate a new repository class
for each `localrepo` instantiation. Server processes based
on `hgwebdir_mod` will instantiate a new `localrepo` for each
HTTP request that involves a repository.
As a result, with a testing process that repeatedly opens a
repository with several extensions activated
(`topic` notably among them), we see a steady increase in
resident memory of 110kB per repository instantiation before this
change. This is also true, if we call `gc.collect()` at each
instantiation, like `hgwebdir_mod` does, or not.
The cause of the leak is that the *values* aren't weak references.
This change uses `weakref.ref` for the values, and this makes
in our measurements the resident size increase drop to 5kB per
repository instantiation, with no explicit call of `gc.collect()`
at all.
There is currently no reason to believe that this remaining leak
of 5kB is related to or even due to Mercurial core.
We've also seen evidence that `ui.ui` instances weren't properly
garbage collected before the change (with the change, they are).
This could explain why the figures are relatively high.
In theory, the collection of weak references could lead to
much more misses in the cache, so we measured the impact on
the original case that was motivation for introducing that cache
in 7e89bd0cfb86 (see also issue5043): `hg convert` of the
mozilla-central repository. The bad news here is that there is a
major memory leak there, both with and without the present changeset.
There were no more cache misses, and we could see no
more memory leak with this change: the resident size after importing
roughly 100000 changesets was at 12.4GB before, and 12.5GB after.
The small increase is mentioned for completeness only, and we
believe that it should be ignored, at least as long as the main
leak isn't fixed. At less than 1% of the main leak, even finding out
whether it is merely noise would be wasteful.
Original context where this was spotted and first mitigated:
https://foss.heptapod.net/heptapod/heptapod/-/issues/466
The leak reduction was also obtained in Heptapod inner HTTP server,
which amounts to the same as `hgwebdir_mod` for these questions.
The measurements done with Python 3.9, similar figures seen with 3.8.
More work on our side would be needed to give measurements with 2.7,
because of testing server process does not support it.
author | Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:30:53 +0200 |
parents | d4e62df1c73d |
children | ccd76e292be5 |
line wrap: on
line source
#require execbit b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test that that doesn't happen anymore $ hg init repo $ cd repo $ echo foo > foo $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo' $ echo bar > bar $ chmod +x bar $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar' manifest of p2: $ hg manifest bar foo $ hg up -qC 0 $ echo >> foo $ hg ci -m 'change foo' created new head manifest of p1: $ hg manifest foo $ hg merge 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ chmod +x foo $ hg ci -m 'merge' this should not mention bar but should mention foo: $ hg tip -v changeset: 3:c53d17ff3380 tag: tip parent: 2:ed1b79f46b9a parent: 1:d394a8db219b user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: foo description: merge $ hg debugindex bar rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000 $ cd ..