tests/test-patch-offset.t
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:02:09 -0700
changeset 33379 7ddb2aa2b7af
parent 32940 75be14993fda
child 36020 bfc9ab6c1bec
permissions -rw-r--r--
match: express anypats(), not prefix(), in terms of the others When I added prefix() in 9789b4a7c595 (match: introduce boolean prefix() method, 2014-10-28), we already had always(), isexact(), and anypats(), so it made sense to write it in terms of them (a prefix matcher is one that isn't any of the other types). It's only now that I realize that it's much more natural to define prefix() explicitly (it's one that uses path: patterns, roughly speaking) and let anypats() be defined in terms of the others. Remember that these methods are all used for determining which fast paths are possible. anypats() simply means that no fast paths are possible (it could be called complex() instead). Further evidence is that rootfilesin:some/dir does not have any patterns, but it's still considered to be an anypats() matcher. That's because anypats() really just means that it's not a prefix() matcher (and not always() and not isexact()). This patch thus changes prefix() to return False by default and anypats() to return True only if the other three are False. Having anypats() be True by default also seems like a good thing, because it means forgetting to override it will lead only to performance bugs, not correctness bugs. Since the base class's implementation changes, we're also forced to update the subclasses. That change exposed and fixed a bug in the differencematcher: for example when both its two input matchers were prefix matchers, we would say that the result was also a prefix matcher, which is incorrect, because e.g "path:dir - path:dir/foo" no longer matches everything under "dir" (which is what prefix() means).


  $ cat > writepatterns.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > 
  > path = sys.argv[1]
  > patterns = sys.argv[2:]
  > 
  > fp = file(path, 'wb')
  > for pattern in patterns:
  >     count = int(pattern[0:-1])
  >     char = pattern[-1] + '\n'
  >     fp.write(char*count)
  > fp.close()
  > EOF

prepare repo

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

These initial lines of Xs were not in the original file used to generate
the patch.  So all the patch hunks need to be applied to a constant offset
within this file.  If the offset isn't tracked then the hunks can be
applied to the wrong lines of this file.

  $ $PYTHON ../writepatterns.py a 34X 10A 1B 10A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 10A 1E 10A 1B 10A
  $ hg commit -Am adda
  adding a

This is a cleaner patch generated via diff
In this case it reproduces the problem when
the output of hg export does not
import patch

  $ hg import -v -m 'b' -d '2 0' - <<EOF
  > --- a/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > +++ b/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > EOF
  applying patch from stdin
  patching file a
  Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #3 succeeded at 109 (offset 34 lines).
  committing files:
  a
  committing manifest
  committing changelog
  created 189885cecb41

compare imported changes against reference file

  $ $PYTHON ../writepatterns.py aref 34X 10A 1B 1a 9A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 1a 9A 1E 10A 1B 1a 9A
  $ diff aref a

  $ cd ..