tests/test-push-checkheads-unpushed-D1.t
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:02:09 -0700
changeset 33379 7ddb2aa2b7af
parent 31986 f4d5d4f7aee1
child 33542 b11e8c67fb0f
permissions -rw-r--r--
match: express anypats(), not prefix(), in terms of the others When I added prefix() in 9789b4a7c595 (match: introduce boolean prefix() method, 2014-10-28), we already had always(), isexact(), and anypats(), so it made sense to write it in terms of them (a prefix matcher is one that isn't any of the other types). It's only now that I realize that it's much more natural to define prefix() explicitly (it's one that uses path: patterns, roughly speaking) and let anypats() be defined in terms of the others. Remember that these methods are all used for determining which fast paths are possible. anypats() simply means that no fast paths are possible (it could be called complex() instead). Further evidence is that rootfilesin:some/dir does not have any patterns, but it's still considered to be an anypats() matcher. That's because anypats() really just means that it's not a prefix() matcher (and not always() and not isexact()). This patch thus changes prefix() to return False by default and anypats() to return True only if the other three are False. Having anypats() be True by default also seems like a good thing, because it means forgetting to override it will lead only to performance bugs, not correctness bugs. Since the base class's implementation changes, we're also forced to update the subclasses. That change exposed and fixed a bug in the differencematcher: for example when both its two input matchers were prefix matchers, we would say that the result was also a prefix matcher, which is incorrect, because e.g "path:dir - path:dir/foo" no longer matches everything under "dir" (which is what prefix() means).

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case D-1
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category D: remote head is "obs-affected" locally, but result is not part of the push
TestCase 1: remote head is rewritten, but successors is not part of the push

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch succeeding the old branch
.. * 1 new unrelated branch
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * pushing only the unrelated branch: denied
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠○ A'
..     |/
..     | ◔ B
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir D1
  $ cd D1
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit A1
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | o  f6082bc4ffef (draft): A1
  |/
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push -r 'desc(B0)'
  pushing to $TESTTMP/D1/server (glob)
  searching for changes
  abort: push creates new remote head 74ff5441d343!
  (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads)
  [255]

  $ cd ../..