view tests/test-bad-extension.t @ 21754:7e14d026c4c4

run-tests: fixes the '--interactive' option error This patch fixes a regression recently introduced by a refactoring. Previously when failure occurs while testing with '--interactive' was enable, it didn't prompt user by asking whether he wants to accept this failure changes or not. This was happening beacuse of the 'if' condition if ret or not self._options.interactive or \ not os.path.exists(test.errpath): Everytime failure occurs, this condition gets true and returns back even when '--interactive' is enabled. This condition don't led the function to execute further, which consist the '--interactive' functionality. Now, on failure with '--interactive' enabled, it prompts user whether he wants to accepts failure changes or not. If yes then test gets passed and returns true, else test gets failed. On every failure, results gets stored in "self.failures.append((test, reason))" But if failure changes accepted by user then test must get "pop out" from failed test list.
author anuraggoel <anurag.dsps@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:45:23 +0530
parents 005a540e9aee
children e955549cd045
line wrap: on
line source

  $ echo 'raise Exception("bit bucket overflow")' > badext.py
  $ abspath=`pwd`/badext.py

  $ echo '[extensions]' >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "gpg =" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "hgext.gpg =" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "badext = $abspath" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "badext2 =" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg -q help help
  *** failed to import extension badext from $TESTTMP/badext.py: bit bucket overflow
  *** failed to import extension badext2: No module named badext2
  hg help [-ec] [TOPIC]
  
  show help for a given topic or a help overview