rust: module policy with importrust
We introduce two rust+c module policies and a new
`policy.importrust()` that makes use of them.
This simple approach provides runtime switching of
implementations, which is crucial for the performance
measurements such as those Octobus does with ASV.
It can also be useful for bug analysis.
It also has the advantage of making conditionals in
Rust callers more uniform, in particular
abstracting over specifics like `demandimport`
At this point, the build stays unchanged, with the rust-cpython based
`rustext` module being built if HGWITHRUSTEXT=cpython.
More transparency for the callers, i.e., just using
`policy.importmod` would be a much longer term and riskier
effort for the following reasons:
1. It would require to define common module boundaries
for the three or four cases (pure, c, rust+ext, cffi) and that
is premature with the Rust extension currently under heavy
development in areas that are outside the scope of the C extensions.
2. It would imply internal API changes that are not currently wished,
as the case of ancestors demonstrates.
3. The lack of data or property-like attributes (tp_member
and tp_getset) in current `rust-cpython` makes it impossible to
achieve direct transparent replacement of pure Python classes by
Rust extension code, meaning that the caller sometimes has to be able
to make adjustments or provide additional wrapping.
# discovery.py - protocol changeset discovery functions
#
# Copyright 2010 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
import collections
from .i18n import _
from .node import (
nullid,
short,
)
from . import (
error,
pycompat,
)
def findcommonincoming(repo, remote, heads=None, force=False):
"""Return a tuple (common, fetch, heads) used to identify the common
subset of nodes between repo and remote.
"common" is a list of (at least) the heads of the common subset.
"fetch" is a list of roots of the nodes that would be incoming, to be
supplied to changegroupsubset.
"heads" is either the supplied heads, or else the remote's heads.
"""
knownnode = repo.changelog.hasnode
search = []
fetch = set()
seen = set()
seenbranch = set()
base = set()
if not heads:
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
heads = e.callcommand('heads', {}).result()
if repo.changelog.tip() == nullid:
base.add(nullid)
if heads != [nullid]:
return [nullid], [nullid], list(heads)
return [nullid], [], heads
# assume we're closer to the tip than the root
# and start by examining the heads
repo.ui.status(_("searching for changes\n"))
unknown = []
for h in heads:
if not knownnode(h):
unknown.append(h)
else:
base.add(h)
if not unknown:
return list(base), [], list(heads)
req = set(unknown)
reqcnt = 0
progress = repo.ui.makeprogress(_('searching'), unit=_('queries'))
# search through remote branches
# a 'branch' here is a linear segment of history, with four parts:
# head, root, first parent, second parent
# (a branch always has two parents (or none) by definition)
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
branches = e.callcommand('branches', {'nodes': unknown}).result()
unknown = collections.deque(branches)
while unknown:
r = []
while unknown:
n = unknown.popleft()
if n[0] in seen:
continue
repo.ui.debug("examining %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
if n[0] == nullid: # found the end of the branch
pass
elif n in seenbranch:
repo.ui.debug("branch already found\n")
continue
elif n[1] and knownnode(n[1]): # do we know the base?
repo.ui.debug("found incomplete branch %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
search.append(n[0:2]) # schedule branch range for scanning
seenbranch.add(n)
else:
if n[1] not in seen and n[1] not in fetch:
if knownnode(n[2]) and knownnode(n[3]):
repo.ui.debug("found new changeset %s\n" %
short(n[1]))
fetch.add(n[1]) # earliest unknown
for p in n[2:4]:
if knownnode(p):
base.add(p) # latest known
for p in n[2:4]:
if p not in req and not knownnode(p):
r.append(p)
req.add(p)
seen.add(n[0])
if r:
reqcnt += 1
progress.increment()
repo.ui.debug("request %d: %s\n" %
(reqcnt, " ".join(map(short, r))))
for p in pycompat.xrange(0, len(r), 10):
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
branches = e.callcommand('branches', {
'nodes': r[p:p + 10],
}).result()
for b in branches:
repo.ui.debug("received %s:%s\n" %
(short(b[0]), short(b[1])))
unknown.append(b)
# do binary search on the branches we found
while search:
newsearch = []
reqcnt += 1
progress.increment()
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
between = e.callcommand('between', {'pairs': search}).result()
for n, l in zip(search, between):
l.append(n[1])
p = n[0]
f = 1
for i in l:
repo.ui.debug("narrowing %d:%d %s\n" % (f, len(l), short(i)))
if knownnode(i):
if f <= 2:
repo.ui.debug("found new branch changeset %s\n" %
short(p))
fetch.add(p)
base.add(i)
else:
repo.ui.debug("narrowed branch search to %s:%s\n"
% (short(p), short(i)))
newsearch.append((p, i))
break
p, f = i, f * 2
search = newsearch
# sanity check our fetch list
for f in fetch:
if knownnode(f):
raise error.RepoError(_("already have changeset ")
+ short(f[:4]))
base = list(base)
if base == [nullid]:
if force:
repo.ui.warn(_("warning: repository is unrelated\n"))
else:
raise error.Abort(_("repository is unrelated"))
repo.ui.debug("found new changesets starting at " +
" ".join([short(f) for f in fetch]) + "\n")
progress.complete()
repo.ui.debug("%d total queries\n" % reqcnt)
return base, list(fetch), heads