view tests/test-merge-remove.t @ 25622:85294076adce

revset: make use of natively-computed set for 'draft()' and 'secret()'

If the computation of a set for each phase (done in C) is available,
we use it directly instead of applying a simple filter. This give a
massive speed-up in the vast majority of cases.

On my mercurial repo with about 15000 out of 40000 draft changesets:

revset: draft()
   plain         min           first         last
0) 0.011201      0.019950      0.009844      0.000074
1) 0.000284   2% 0.000312   1% 0.000314   3% 0.000315 x4.3

Bad performance for "last" come from the handling of the 15000 elements set
(memory allocation, filtering hidden changesets (99% of it) etc. compared to
applying the filter only on a handfuld of revisions (the first draft changesets
being close of tip).

This is not seen as an issue since:

* Timing is still pretty good and in line with all the other one,
* Current user of Vanilla Mercurial will not have 1/3 of their repo draft,

This bad effect disappears when phase's set is smaller. (about 200 secrets):

revset: secret()
   plain         min           first         last
0) 0.011181      0.022228      0.010851      0.000452
1) 0.000058   0% 0.000084   0% 0.000087   0% 0.000087  19%

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'

  $ echo foo2 >> foo
  $ echo bleh > bar
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg mv foo foo1
  $ echo foo1 > foo1
  $ hg cat foo >> foo1
  $ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
  created new head

  $ hg merge
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  m   0         -2 unset               bar
  m   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -q
  M bar
  M foo1


Removing foo1 and bar:

  $ cp foo1 F
  $ cp bar B
  $ hg rm -f foo1 bar

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  r   0         -1 set                 bar
  r   0         -1 set                 foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  R bar
  R foo1


Re-adding foo1 and bar:

  $ cp F foo1
  $ cp B bar
  $ hg add -v foo1 bar
  adding bar
  adding foo1

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo


Reverting foo1 and bar:

  $ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
  saving current version of bar as bar.orig
  reverting bar
  saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
  reverting foo1

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo

  $ hg diff

Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove

  $ rm *
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg rm bar
  $ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
  $ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
  $ hg merge
  bar: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat bar
  memories of buried pirate treasure

Those who use force will lose

  $ hg merge -f
  remote changed bar which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat bar
  bleh
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M foo1