view tests/test-simple-update.t @ 23444:88629daa727b

merge: demonstrate that directory renames can lose local file content

When a directory has been renamed on the local branch and a file has
been added in the old location on a remote branch, we move that new
file to the new location. Unfortunately, if there is already a file
there, we overwrite it with the contents from the remote branch. For
untracked local files, we should probably abort, and for tracked local
files, we should merge the contents. To start with, let's add a test
to demonstrate the breakage. Also note that while files merged in from
a remote branch are normally (and unintuitively) reported as modified,
these files are reported as added.

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo foo>foo
  $ hg addremove
  adding foo
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

  $ hg clone . ../branch
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ../branch
  $ hg co
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo bar>>foo
  $ hg commit -m "2"

  $ cd ../test

  $ hg pull ../branch
  pulling from ../branch
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions

  $ hg co
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat foo
  foo
  bar

  $ hg manifest --debug
  6f4310b00b9a147241b071a60c28a650827fb03d 644   foo

update to rev 0 with a date

  $ hg upd -d foo 0
  abort: you can't specify a revision and a date
  [255]

  $ cd ..