tests/test-double-merge.t
author Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net>
Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:50:35 +0200
changeset 40694 8a0136f69027
parent 28318 564a354f7f35
child 42167 91a0bc50b288
permissions -rw-r--r--
context: introduce an `isintroducedafter` method and use it in copies Right now, copy tracing make effort to not traverse the graph too much to save performance. It uses a "limit" acting as a floor revision past which data are no longer relevant to the current copy tracing. However, to enforce this limit, it does a call to `filectx.rev()` and that call can trigger a graph traversal on its own. That extra graph traversal is unaware of the current limit and can become very expensive. That cost is increased by the nature of work done in adjust link rev, we are not only walking down the graph, we are also checking the affected file for each revision we walk through. Something significantly more expensive than the walk itself. To work around this we need to make the `filectx` operation aware of the current limit. The first step is to introduce a dedicated method: `isintroducedafter`. We'll then rework that method logic to stop traversal as soon as possible.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for foo (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..