view mercurial/compat.h @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing

The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old
revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given
that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given
missing revisons from the undecided set.

The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make
it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of
precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on
children of the given missing revisions.

This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface
between the two languages has clear benefits.

On discoveries with initial undecided sets
small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of
computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration
becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on
reachableroots2.

For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with
an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures:

Rust version with simple iteration
  addcommons: 57.287us
  first undecided computation: 184.278334ms
  first children cache computation: 131.056us
  addmissings iteration: 42.766us
  first addinfo total: 185.24 ms

Python + C version
  first addcommons: 0.29 ms
  addcommons 0.21 ms
  first undecided computation 191.35 ms
  addmissings 45.75 ms
  first addinfo total: 237.77 ms

On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid
makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version,
but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and
subsequent iterations.
Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions:

Rust version:
  first undecided computation: 293.842629ms
  first children cache computation: 407.911297ms
  addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms
  first addinfo total: 776.02 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings: 143.062us

Python + C version:
  first undecided computation 298.13 ms
  addmissings 80.13 ms
  first addinfo total: 399.62 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings 52.88 ms

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

#ifndef _HG_COMPAT_H_
#define _HG_COMPAT_H_

#ifdef _WIN32
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#if _MSC_VER < 1900
/* msvc 6.0 has problems */
#define inline __inline
#if defined(_WIN64)
typedef __int64 ssize_t;
typedef unsigned __int64 uintptr_t;
#else
typedef int ssize_t;
typedef unsigned int uintptr_t;
#endif
typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef short int16_t;
typedef long int32_t;
typedef __int64 int64_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
typedef unsigned long uint32_t;
typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t;
#else
/* VC++ 14 */
#include <stdint.h>

#if defined(_WIN64)
typedef __int64 ssize_t;
#else
typedef int ssize_t;
#endif
#endif /* _MSC_VER < 1900 */

#else
/* not msvc */
#include <stdint.h>
#endif
#else
/* not windows */
#include <sys/types.h>
#if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
#include <ByteOrder.h>
#else
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#endif
#include <inttypes.h>
#endif

#if defined __hpux || defined __SUNPRO_C || defined _AIX
#define inline
#endif

#ifdef __linux
#define inline __inline
#endif

#endif