view tests/test-bookmarks-current.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given missing revisons from the undecided set. The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on children of the given missing revisions. This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface between the two languages has clear benefits. On discoveries with initial undecided sets small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on reachableroots2. For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures: Rust version with simple iteration addcommons: 57.287us first undecided computation: 184.278334ms first children cache computation: 131.056us addmissings iteration: 42.766us first addinfo total: 185.24 ms Python + C version first addcommons: 0.29 ms addcommons 0.21 ms first undecided computation 191.35 ms addmissings 45.75 ms first addinfo total: 237.77 ms On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version, but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and subsequent iterations. Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions: Rust version: first undecided computation: 293.842629ms first children cache computation: 407.911297ms addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms first addinfo total: 776.02 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings: 143.062us Python + C version: first undecided computation 298.13 ms addmissings 80.13 ms first addinfo total: 399.62 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings 52.88 ms Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428
author Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net>
date Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:16:39 +0200
parents c48738923dba
children 95c4cca641f6
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init

no bookmarks

  $ hg bookmarks
  no bookmarks set

set bookmark X

  $ hg bookmark X

list bookmarks

  $ hg bookmark
   * X                         -1:000000000000

list bookmarks with color

  $ hg --config extensions.color= --config color.mode=ansi \
  >     bookmark --color=always
  \x1b[0;32m * \x1b[0m\x1b[0;32mX\x1b[0m\x1b[0;32m                         -1:000000000000\x1b[0m (esc)

update to bookmark X

  $ hg bookmarks
   * X                         -1:000000000000
  $ hg update X
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

list bookmarks

  $ hg bookmarks
   * X                         -1:000000000000

rename

  $ hg bookmark -m X Z

list bookmarks

  $ cat .hg/bookmarks.current
  Z (no-eol)
  $ cat .hg/bookmarks
  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Z
  $ hg bookmarks
   * Z                         -1:000000000000

new bookmarks X and Y, first one made active

  $ hg bookmark Y X

list bookmarks

  $ hg bookmark
     X                         -1:000000000000
   * Y                         -1:000000000000
     Z                         -1:000000000000

  $ hg bookmark -d X

commit

  $ echo 'b' > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m'test'

list bookmarks

  $ hg bookmark
   * Y                         0:719295282060
     Z                         -1:000000000000

Verify that switching to Z updates the active bookmark:
  $ hg update Z
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (activating bookmark Z)
  $ hg bookmark
     Y                         0:719295282060
   * Z                         -1:000000000000

Switch back to Y for the remaining tests in this file:
  $ hg update Y
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (activating bookmark Y)

delete bookmarks

  $ hg bookmark -d Y
  $ hg bookmark -d Z

list bookmarks

  $ hg bookmark
  no bookmarks set

update to tip

  $ hg update tip
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

set bookmark Y using -r . but make sure that the active
bookmark is not activated

  $ hg bookmark -r . Y

list bookmarks, Y should not be active

  $ hg bookmark
     Y                         0:719295282060

now, activate Y

  $ hg up -q Y

set bookmark Z using -i

  $ hg bookmark -r . -i Z
  $ hg bookmarks
   * Y                         0:719295282060
     Z                         0:719295282060

deactivate active bookmark using -i

  $ hg bookmark -i Y
  $ hg bookmarks
     Y                         0:719295282060
     Z                         0:719295282060

  $ hg up -q Y
  $ hg bookmark -i
  $ hg bookmarks
     Y                         0:719295282060
     Z                         0:719295282060
  $ hg bookmark -i
  no active bookmark
  $ hg up -q Y
  $ hg bookmarks
   * Y                         0:719295282060
     Z                         0:719295282060

deactivate active bookmark while renaming

  $ hg bookmark -i -m Y X
  $ hg bookmarks
     X                         0:719295282060
     Z                         0:719295282060

bare update moves the active bookmark forward and clear the divergent bookmarks

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am1
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg ci -Am2
  $ hg bookmark X@1 -r 1
  $ hg bookmark X@2 -r 2
  $ hg update X
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (activating bookmark X)
  $ hg bookmarks
   * X                         0:719295282060
     X@1                       1:cc586d725fbe
     X@2                       2:49e1c4e84c58
     Z                         0:719295282060
  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updating bookmark X
  $ hg bookmarks
   * X                         2:49e1c4e84c58
     Z                         0:719295282060

test deleting .hg/bookmarks.current when explicitly updating
to a revision

  $ echo a >> b
  $ hg ci -m.
  $ hg up -q X
  $ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current

try to update to it again to make sure we don't
set and then unset it

  $ hg up -q X
  $ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current

  $ hg up -q 1
  $ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
  [1]

when a bookmark is active, hg up -r . is
analogous to hg book -i <active bookmark>

  $ hg up -q X
  $ hg up -q .
  $ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
  [1]

issue 4552 -- simulate a pull moving the active bookmark

  $ hg up -q X
  $ printf "Z" > .hg/bookmarks.current
  $ hg log -T '{activebookmark}\n' -r Z
  Z
  $ hg log -T '{bookmarks % "{active}\n"}' -r Z
  Z

test that updating to closed branch head also advances active bookmark

  $ hg commit --close-branch -m "closed"
  $ hg update -q ".^1"
  $ hg bookmark Y
  $ hg bookmarks
     X                         3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
   * Y                         3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
     Z                         0:719295282060
  $ hg update
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updating bookmark Y
  $ hg bookmarks
     X                         3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
   * Y                         4:8fa964221e8e
     Z                         0:719295282060
  $ hg parents -q
  4:8fa964221e8e

Checks command to retrieve active bookmark
------------------------------------------

display how "{activebookmark}" template is unsuitable for the task

  $ hg book -T '- {activebookmark}\n'
  - 
  - Y
  - 

  $ hg book -r . W
  $ hg book -T '- {activebookmark}\n'
  - Y
  - 
  - Y
  - 

  $ hg bookmarks -ql .
  Y
  $ hg bookmarks --inactive
  $ hg bookmarks -ql .
  abort: no active bookmark!
  [255]