view tests/test-merge-halt.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing

The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old
revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given
that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given
missing revisons from the undecided set.

The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make
it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of
precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on
children of the given missing revisions.

This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface
between the two languages has clear benefits.

On discoveries with initial undecided sets
small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of
computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration
becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on
reachableroots2.

For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with
an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures:

Rust version with simple iteration
  addcommons: 57.287us
  first undecided computation: 184.278334ms
  first children cache computation: 131.056us
  addmissings iteration: 42.766us
  first addinfo total: 185.24 ms

Python + C version
  first addcommons: 0.29 ms
  addcommons 0.21 ms
  first undecided computation 191.35 ms
  addmissings 45.75 ms
  first addinfo total: 237.77 ms

On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid
makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version,
but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and
subsequent iterations.
Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions:

Rust version:
  first undecided computation: 293.842629ms
  first children cache computation: 407.911297ms
  addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms
  first addinfo total: 776.02 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings: 143.062us

Python + C version:
  first undecided computation 298.13 ms
  addmissings 80.13 ms
  first addinfo total: 399.62 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings 52.88 ms

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > rebase=
  > [phases]
  > publish=False
  > [merge]
  > EOF

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo a > a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg commit -qAm ab
  $ echo c >> a
  $ echo c >> b
  $ hg commit -qAm c
  $ hg up -q ".^"
  $ echo d >> a
  $ echo d >> b
  $ hg commit -qAm d

Testing on-failure=continue
  $ echo on-failure=continue >> $HGRCPATH
  $ hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool false
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  merging a failed!
  merging b failed!
  unresolved conflicts (see hg resolve, then hg rebase --continue)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  U a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Testing on-failure=halt
  $ echo on-failure=halt >> $HGRCPATH
  $ hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool false
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  merging a failed!
  merge halted after failed merge (see hg resolve)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  U a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Testing on-failure=prompt
  $ cat <<EOS >> $HGRCPATH
  > [merge]
  > on-failure=prompt
  > [ui]
  > interactive=1
  > EOS
  $ cat <<EOS | hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool false
  > y
  > n
  > EOS
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  merging a failed!
  continue merge operation (yn)? y
  merging b failed!
  continue merge operation (yn)? n
  merge halted after failed merge (see hg resolve)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  U a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Check that successful tool with failed post-check halts the merge
  $ cat <<EOS >> $HGRCPATH
  > [merge-tools]
  > true.check=changed
  > EOS
  $ cat <<EOS | hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool true
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOS
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
   output file a appears unchanged
  was merge successful (yn)? y
   output file b appears unchanged
  was merge successful (yn)? n
  merging b failed!
  continue merge operation (yn)? n
  merge halted after failed merge (see hg resolve)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  R a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Check that conflicts with conflict check also halts the merge
  $ cat <<EOS >> $HGRCPATH
  > [merge-tools]
  > true.check=conflicts
  > true.premerge=keep
  > [merge]
  > on-failure=halt
  > EOS
  $ hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool true
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  merging a failed!
  merge halted after failed merge (see hg resolve)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  U a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Check that always-prompt also can halt the merge
  $ cat <<EOS | hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool true --config merge-tools.true.check=prompt
  > y
  > n
  > EOS
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  was merge of 'a' successful (yn)? y
  was merge of 'b' successful (yn)? n
  merging b failed!
  merge halted after failed merge (see hg resolve)
  [1]

  $ hg resolve --list
  R a
  U b

  $ hg rebase --abort
  rebase aborted

Check that successful tool otherwise allows the merge to continue
  $ hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool echo --keep --config merge-tools.echo.premerge=keep
  rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
  merging a
  merging b
  $TESTTMP/repo/a *a~base* *a~other* (glob)
  $TESTTMP/repo/b *b~base* *b~other* (glob)