view tests/test-merge-subrepos.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing

The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old
revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given
that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given
missing revisons from the undecided set.

The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make
it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of
precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on
children of the given missing revisions.

This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface
between the two languages has clear benefits.

On discoveries with initial undecided sets
small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of
computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration
becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on
reachableroots2.

For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with
an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures:

Rust version with simple iteration
  addcommons: 57.287us
  first undecided computation: 184.278334ms
  first children cache computation: 131.056us
  addmissings iteration: 42.766us
  first addinfo total: 185.24 ms

Python + C version
  first addcommons: 0.29 ms
  addcommons 0.21 ms
  first undecided computation 191.35 ms
  addmissings 45.75 ms
  first addinfo total: 237.77 ms

On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid
makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version,
but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and
subsequent iterations.
Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions:

Rust version:
  first undecided computation: 293.842629ms
  first children cache computation: 407.911297ms
  addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms
  first addinfo total: 776.02 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings: 143.062us

Python + C version:
  first undecided computation 298.13 ms
  addmissings 80.13 ms
  first addinfo total: 399.62 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings 52.88 ms

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

  $ hg init

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add a'

  $ hg init subrepo
  $ echo 'subrepo = http://example.net/libfoo' > .hgsub
  $ hg ci -qAm 'added subrepo'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo ax > a
  $ hg ci -m 'changed a'
  created new head

  $ hg up -qC 1
  $ cd subrepo
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg add b
  $ cd ..

Should fail, since there are added files to subrepo:

  $ hg merge
  abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
  [255]

Deleted files trigger a '+' marker in top level repos.  Deleted files are also
noticed by `update --check` in the top level repo.

  $ hg ci -Sqm 'add b'
  $ echo change > subrepo/b

  $ hg ci -Sm 'change b'
  committing subrepository subrepo

  $ rm a
  $ hg id
  9bfe45a197d7+ tip
  $ hg sum
  parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
   change b
  branch: default
  commit: 1 deleted (clean)
  update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
  phases: 5 draft

  $ hg up --check -r '.^'
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg st -S
  ! a
  $ hg up -Cq .

Test that dirty is consistent through subrepos

  $ rm subrepo/b

A deleted subrepo file is flagged as dirty, like the top level repo

  $ hg id --config extensions.blackbox= --config blackbox.dirty=True \
  > --config blackbox.track='command commandfinish'
  9bfe45a197d7+ tip
  $ cat .hg/blackbox.log
  * @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> serve --cmdserver chgunix * (glob) (chg !)
  * @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> id --config *extensions.blackbox=* --config *blackbox.dirty=True* (glob)
  * @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> id --config *extensions.blackbox=* --config *blackbox.dirty=True* exited 0 * (glob)

TODO: a deleted file should be listed as such, like the top level repo

  $ hg sum
  parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
   change b
  branch: default
  commit: (clean)
  update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
  phases: 5 draft

Modified subrepo files are noticed by `update --check` and `summary`

  $ echo mod > subrepo/b
  $ hg st -S
  M subrepo/b

  $ hg up -r '.^' --check
  abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
  [255]

  $ hg sum
  parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
   change b
  branch: default
  commit: 1 subrepos
  update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
  phases: 5 draft

TODO: why is -R needed here?  If it's because the subrepo is treated as a
discrete unit, then this should probably warn or something.
  $ hg revert -R subrepo --no-backup subrepo/b -r .

  $ rm subrepo/b
  $ hg st -S
  ! subrepo/b

`hg update --check` notices a subrepo with a missing file, like it notices a
missing file in the top level repo.

  $ hg up -r '.^' --check
  abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
  [255]

  $ hg up -r '.^' --config ui.interactive=True << EOF
  > d
  > EOF
  file 'b' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [destination].
  You can use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved.
  What do you want to do? d
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

XXX: There's a difference between wdir() and '.', so there should be a status.
`hg files -S` from the top is also missing 'subrepo/b'.

  $ hg st -S
  $ hg st -R subrepo
  $ hg files -R subrepo
  [1]
  $ hg files -R subrepo -r '.'
  subrepo/b

  $ hg bookmark -r tip @other
  $ echo xyz > subrepo/c
  $ hg ci -SAm 'add c'
  adding subrepo/c
  committing subrepository subrepo
  created new head
  $ rm subrepo/c

Merge sees deleted subrepo files as an uncommitted change

  $ hg merge @other
  abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
  [255]