view tests/test-rebase-base-flag.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing

The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old
revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given
that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given
missing revisons from the undecided set.

The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make
it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of
precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on
children of the given missing revisions.

This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface
between the two languages has clear benefits.

On discoveries with initial undecided sets
small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of
computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration
becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on
reachableroots2.

For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with
an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures:

Rust version with simple iteration
  addcommons: 57.287us
  first undecided computation: 184.278334ms
  first children cache computation: 131.056us
  addmissings iteration: 42.766us
  first addinfo total: 185.24 ms

Python + C version
  first addcommons: 0.29 ms
  addcommons 0.21 ms
  first undecided computation 191.35 ms
  addmissings 45.75 ms
  first addinfo total: 237.77 ms

On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid
makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version,
but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and
subsequent iterations.
Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions:

Rust version:
  first undecided computation: 293.842629ms
  first children cache computation: 407.911297ms
  addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms
  first addinfo total: 776.02 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings: 143.062us

Python + C version:
  first undecided computation 298.13 ms
  addmissings 80.13 ms
  first addinfo total: 399.62 ms
  taking initial sample
  query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms
  query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200
  addmissings 52.88 ms

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

Test the "--base" flag of the rebase command. (Tests unrelated to the "--base"
flag should probably live in somewhere else)

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > rebase=
  > drawdag=$TESTDIR/drawdag.py
  > 
  > [phases]
  > publish=False
  > 
  > [alias]
  > tglog = log -G --template "{rev}: {node|short} {desc}"
  > EOF

  $ rebasewithdag() {
  >   N=`"$PYTHON" -c "print($N+1)"`
  >   hg init repo$N && cd repo$N
  >   hg debugdrawdag
  >   hg rebase "$@" > _rebasetmp
  >   r=$?
  >   grep -v 'saved backup bundle' _rebasetmp
  >   [ $r -eq 0 ] && hg tglog
  >   cd ..
  >   return $r
  > }

Single branching point, without merge:

  $ rebasewithdag -b D -d Z <<'EOS'
  >     D E
  >     |/
  > Z B C   # C: branching point, E should be picked
  >  \|/    # B should not be picked
  >   A
  >   |
  >   R
  > EOS
  rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
  rebasing 5:4526cf523425 "D" (D)
  rebasing 6:b296604d9846 "E" (E tip)
  o  6: 4870f5e7df37 E
  |
  | o  5: dc999528138a D
  |/
  o  4: 6b3e11729672 C
  |
  o  3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
  |
  | o  2: c1e6b162678d B
  |/
  o  1: 21a6c4502885 A
  |
  o  0: b41ce7760717 R
  
Multiple branching points caused by selecting a single merge changeset:

  $ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOS'
  >     E
  >    /|
  >   B C D  # B, C: multiple branching points
  >   | |/   # D should not be picked
  > Z | /
  >  \|/
  >   A
  >   |
  >   R
  > EOS
  rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
  rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
  rebasing 6:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
  o    6: 00598421b616 E
  |\
  | o  5: 6b3e11729672 C
  | |
  o |  4: 85260910e847 B
  |/
  o  3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
  |
  | o  2: 8924700906fe D
  |/
  o  1: 21a6c4502885 A
  |
  o  0: b41ce7760717 R
  
Rebase should not extend the "--base" revset using "descendants":

  $ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS'
  >     E
  >    /|
  > Z B C  # descendants(B) = B+E. With E, C will be included incorrectly
  >  \|/
  >   A
  >   |
  >   R
  > EOS
  rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
  rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
  o    5: e583bf3ff54c E
  |\
  | o  4: 85260910e847 B
  | |
  | o  3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
  | |
  o |  2: d6003a550c2c C
  |/
  o  1: 21a6c4502885 A
  |
  o  0: b41ce7760717 R
  
Rebase should not simplify the "--base" revset using "roots":

  $ rebasewithdag -b B+E -d Z <<'EOS'
  >     E
  >    /|
  > Z B C  # roots(B+E) = B. Without E, C will be missed incorrectly
  >  \|/
  >   A
  >   |
  >   R
  > EOS
  rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
  rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
  rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
  o    5: 00598421b616 E
  |\
  | o  4: 6b3e11729672 C
  | |
  o |  3: 85260910e847 B
  |/
  o  2: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
  |
  o  1: 21a6c4502885 A
  |
  o  0: b41ce7760717 R
  
The destination is one of the two branching points of a merge:

  $ rebasewithdag -b F -d Z <<'EOS'
  >     F
  >    / \
  >   E   D
  >  /   /
  > Z   C
  >  \ /
  >   B
  >   |
  >   A
  > EOS
  nothing to rebase
  [1]

Multiple branching points caused by multiple bases (issue5420):

  $ rebasewithdag -b E1+E2+C2+B1 -d Z <<'EOS'
  >   Z    E2
  >   |   /
  >   F E1 C2
  >   |/  /
  >   E C1 B2
  >   |/  /
  >   C B1
  >   |/
  >   B
  >   |
  >   A
  >   |
  >   R
  > EOS
  rebasing 3:a113dbaa660a "B1" (B1)
  rebasing 5:06ce7b1cc8c2 "B2" (B2)
  rebasing 6:0ac98cce32d3 "C1" (C1)
  rebasing 8:781512f5e33d "C2" (C2)
  rebasing 9:428d8c18f641 "E1" (E1)
  rebasing 11:e1bf82f6b6df "E2" (E2)
  o  12: e4a37b6fdbd2 E2
  |
  o  11: 9675bea983df E1
  |
  | o  10: 4faf5d4c80dc C2
  | |
  | o  9: d4799b1ad57d C1
  |/
  | o  8: 772732dc64d6 B2
  | |
  | o  7: ad3ac528a49f B1
  |/
  o  6: 2cbdfca6b9d5 Z
  |
  o  5: fcdb3293ec13 F
  |
  o  4: a4652bb8ac54 E
  |
  o  3: bd5548558fcf C
  |
  o  2: c1e6b162678d B
  |
  o  1: 21a6c4502885 A
  |
  o  0: b41ce7760717 R
  
Multiple branching points with multiple merges:

  $ rebasewithdag -b G+P -d Z <<'EOS'
  > G   H   P
  > |\ /|   |\
  > F E D   M N
  >  \|/|  /| |\
  > Z C B I J K L
  >  \|/  |/  |/
  >   A   A   A
  > EOS
  rebasing 2:dc0947a82db8 "C" (C)
  rebasing 8:4e4f9194f9f1 "D" (D)
  rebasing 9:03ca77807e91 "E" (E)
  rebasing 10:afc707c82df0 "F" (F)
  rebasing 13:690dfff91e9e "G" (G)
  rebasing 14:2893b886bb10 "H" (H)
  rebasing 3:08ebfeb61bac "I" (I)
  rebasing 4:a0a5005cec67 "J" (J)
  rebasing 5:83780307a7e8 "K" (K)
  rebasing 6:e131637a1cb6 "L" (L)
  rebasing 11:d1f6d0c3c7e4 "M" (M)
  rebasing 12:7aaec6f81888 "N" (N)
  rebasing 15:325bc8f1760d "P" (P tip)
  o    15: 6ef6a0ea3b18 P
  |\
  | o    14: 20ba3610a7e5 N
  | |\
  o \ \    13: cd4f6c06d2ab M
  |\ \ \
  | | | o  12: bca872041455 L
  | | | |
  | | o |  11: 7bbb6c8a6ad7 K
  | | |/
  | o /  10: de0cbffe893e J
  | |/
  o /  9: 0e710f176a88 I
  |/
  | o    8: 52507bab39ca H
  | |\
  | | | o  7: bb5fe4652f0d G
  | | |/|
  | | | o  6: f4ad4b31daf4 F
  | | | |
  | | o |  5: b168f85f2e78 E
  | | |/
  | o |  4: 8d09fcdb5594 D
  | |\|
  +---o  3: ab70b4c5a9c9 C
  | |
  o |  2: 262e37e34f63 Z
  | |
  | o  1: 112478962961 B
  |/
  o  0: 426bada5c675 A
  
Slightly more complex merge case (mentioned in https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-November/091074.html):

  $ rebasewithdag -b A3+B3 -d Z <<'EOF'
  > Z     C1    A3     B3
  > |    /     / \    / \
  > M3 C0     A1  A2 B1  B2
  > | /       |   |  |   |
  > M2        M1  C1 C1  M3
  > |
  > M1
  > |
  > M0
  > EOF
  rebasing 4:8817fae53c94 "C0" (C0)
  rebasing 6:06ca5dfe3b5b "B2" (B2)
  rebasing 7:73508237b032 "C1" (C1)
  rebasing 9:fdb955e2faed "A2" (A2)
  rebasing 11:4e449bd1a643 "A3" (A3)
  rebasing 10:0a33b0519128 "B1" (B1)
  rebasing 12:209327807c3a "B3" (B3 tip)
  o    12: ceb984566332 B3
  |\
  | o  11: 19d93caac497 B1
  | |
  | | o    10: 058e73d3916b A3
  | | |\
  | +---o  9: 0ba13ad72234 A2
  | | |
  | o |  8: c122c2af10c6 C1
  | | |
  o | |  7: 74275896650e B2
  | | |
  | o |  6: 455ba9bd3ea2 C0
  |/ /
  o |  5: b3d7d2fda53b Z
  | |
  o |  4: 182ab6383dd7 M3
  | |
  o |  3: 6c3f73563d5f M2
  | |
  | o  2: 88c860fffcc2 A1
  |/
  o  1: bc852baa85dd M1
  |
  o  0: dbdfc5c9bcd5 M0
  
Disconnected graph:

  $ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS'
  >   B
  >   |
  > Z A
  > EOS
  nothing to rebase from 112478962961 to 48b9aae0607f
  [1]

Multiple roots. Roots are ancestors of dest:

  $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
  > D Z B
  >  \|\|
  >   C A
  > EOF
  rebasing 2:112478962961 "B" (B)
  rebasing 3:b70f76719894 "D" (D)
  o  4: 511efad7bf13 D
  |
  | o  3: 25c4e279af62 B
  |/
  o    2: 3a49f54d7bb1 Z
  |\
  | o  1: 96cc3511f894 C
  |
  o  0: 426bada5c675 A
  
Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest:

  $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
  > Z B D
  >  \|\|
  >   A C
  > EOF
  nothing to rebase from f675d5a1c6a4+b70f76719894 to 262e37e34f63
  [1]

Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest. Select using a merge:

  $ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOF'
  >   E
  >   |\
  > Z B D
  >  \|\|
  >   A C
  > EOF
  rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B)
  rebasing 5:f68696fe6af8 "E" (E tip)
  o    5: f6e6f5081554 E
  |\
  | o    4: 30cabcba27be B
  | |\
  | | o  3: 262e37e34f63 Z
  | | |
  o | |  2: b70f76719894 D
  |/ /
  o /  1: 96cc3511f894 C
   /
  o  0: 426bada5c675 A
  
Multiple roots. Two children share two parents while dest has only one parent:

  $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
  > Z B D
  >  \|\|\
  >   A C A
  > EOF
  rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B)
  rebasing 3:c2a779e13b56 "D" (D)
  o    4: 5eecd056b5f8 D
  |\
  +---o  3: 30cabcba27be B
  | |/
  | o  2: 262e37e34f63 Z
  | |
  o |  1: 96cc3511f894 C
   /
  o  0: 426bada5c675 A