view tests/test-remotefilelog-clone.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given missing revisons from the undecided set. The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on children of the given missing revisions. This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface between the two languages has clear benefits. On discoveries with initial undecided sets small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on reachableroots2. For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures: Rust version with simple iteration addcommons: 57.287us first undecided computation: 184.278334ms first children cache computation: 131.056us addmissings iteration: 42.766us first addinfo total: 185.24 ms Python + C version first addcommons: 0.29 ms addcommons 0.21 ms first undecided computation 191.35 ms addmissings 45.75 ms first addinfo total: 237.77 ms On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version, but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and subsequent iterations. Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions: Rust version: first undecided computation: 293.842629ms first children cache computation: 407.911297ms addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms first addinfo total: 776.02 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings: 143.062us Python + C version: first undecided computation 298.13 ms addmissings 80.13 ms first addinfo total: 399.62 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings 52.88 ms Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428
author Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net>
date Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:16:39 +0200
parents a0886a4d6dce
children db9e33beb0fb
line wrap: on
line source

#require no-windows

  $ . "$TESTDIR/remotefilelog-library.sh"

  $ hg init master
  $ cd master
  $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [remotefilelog]
  > server=True
  > EOF
  $ echo x > x
  $ hg commit -qAm x

  $ cd ..

# shallow clone from full

  $ hgcloneshallow ssh://user@dummy/master shallow --noupdate
  streaming all changes
  2 files to transfer, 227 bytes of data
  transferred 227 bytes in * seconds (*/sec) (glob)
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  $ cd shallow
  $ cat .hg/requires
  dotencode
  exp-remotefilelog-repo-req-1
  fncache
  generaldelta
  revlogv1
  sparserevlog
  store

  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  1 files fetched over 1 fetches - (1 misses, 0.00% hit ratio) over *s (glob)

  $ cat x
  x

  $ ls .hg/store/data
  $ echo foo > f
  $ hg add f
  $ hg ci -m 'local content'
  $ ls .hg/store/data
  4a0a19218e082a343a1b17e5333409af9d98f0f5

  $ cd ..

# shallow clone from shallow

  $ hgcloneshallow ssh://user@dummy/shallow shallow2  --noupdate
  streaming all changes
  3 files to transfer, 564 bytes of data
  transferred 564 bytes in * seconds (*/sec) (glob)
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  $ cd shallow2
  $ cat .hg/requires
  dotencode
  exp-remotefilelog-repo-req-1
  fncache
  generaldelta
  revlogv1
  sparserevlog
  store
  $ ls .hg/store/data
  4a0a19218e082a343a1b17e5333409af9d98f0f5

  $ hg update
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat x
  x

  $ cd ..

# full clone from shallow

Note: the output to STDERR comes from a different process to the output on
STDOUT and their relative ordering is not deterministic. As a result, the test
was failing sporadically. To avoid this, we capture STDERR to a file and
check its contents separately.

  $ TEMP_STDERR=full-clone-from-shallow.stderr.tmp
  $ hg clone --noupdate ssh://user@dummy/shallow full 2>$TEMP_STDERR
  streaming all changes
  remote: abort: Cannot clone from a shallow repo to a full repo.
  [255]
  $ cat $TEMP_STDERR
  abort: pull failed on remote
  $ rm $TEMP_STDERR

# getbundle full clone

  $ printf '[server]\npreferuncompressed=False\n' >> master/.hg/hgrc
  $ hgcloneshallow ssh://user@dummy/master shallow3
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files
  new changesets b292c1e3311f
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ ls shallow3/.hg/store/data
  $ cat shallow3/.hg/requires
  dotencode
  exp-remotefilelog-repo-req-1
  fncache
  generaldelta
  revlogv1
  sparserevlog
  store