view tests/test-remotefilelog-pull-noshallow.t @ 42743:8c9a6adec67a

rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given missing revisons from the undecided set. The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on children of the given missing revisions. This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface between the two languages has clear benefits. On discoveries with initial undecided sets small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on reachableroots2. For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures: Rust version with simple iteration addcommons: 57.287us first undecided computation: 184.278334ms first children cache computation: 131.056us addmissings iteration: 42.766us first addinfo total: 185.24 ms Python + C version first addcommons: 0.29 ms addcommons 0.21 ms first undecided computation 191.35 ms addmissings 45.75 ms first addinfo total: 237.77 ms On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version, but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and subsequent iterations. Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions: Rust version: first undecided computation: 293.842629ms first children cache computation: 407.911297ms addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms first addinfo total: 776.02 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings: 143.062us Python + C version: first undecided computation 298.13 ms addmissings 80.13 ms first addinfo total: 399.62 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings 52.88 ms Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428
author Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net>
date Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:16:39 +0200
parents 52fbf8a9907c
children
line wrap: on
line source

#require no-windows

  $ . "$TESTDIR/remotefilelog-library.sh"

Set up an extension to make sure remotefilelog clientsetup() runs
unconditionally even if we have never used a local shallow repo.
This mimics behavior when using remotefilelog with chg.  clientsetup() can be
triggered due to a shallow repo, and then the code can later interact with
non-shallow repositories.

  $ cat > setupremotefilelog.py << EOF
  > from mercurial import extensions
  > def extsetup(ui):
  >     remotefilelog = extensions.find(b'remotefilelog')
  >     remotefilelog.onetimeclientsetup(ui)
  > EOF

Set up the master repository to pull from.

  $ hg init master
  $ cd master
  $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [remotefilelog]
  > server=True
  > EOF
  $ echo x > x
  $ hg commit -qAm x

  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/master child -q

We should see the remotefilelog capability here, which advertises that
the server supports our custom getfiles method.

  $ cd master
  $ echo 'hello' | hg -R . serve --stdio | grep capa | identifyrflcaps
  exp-remotefilelog-ssh-getfiles-1
  x_rfl_getfile
  x_rfl_getflogheads
  $ echo 'capabilities' | hg -R . serve --stdio | identifyrflcaps ; echo
  exp-remotefilelog-ssh-getfiles-1
  x_rfl_getfile
  x_rfl_getflogheads
  

Pull to the child repository.  Use our custom setupremotefilelog extension
to ensure that remotefilelog.onetimeclientsetup() gets triggered.  (Without
using chg it normally would not be run in this case since the local repository
is not shallow.)

  $ echo y > y
  $ hg commit -qAm y

  $ cd ../child
  $ hg pull --config extensions.setuprfl=$TESTTMP/setupremotefilelog.py
  pulling from ssh://user@dummy/master
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets d34c38483be9
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg up
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat y
  y

Test that bundle works in a non-remotefilelog repo w/ remotefilelog loaded

  $ echo y >> y
  $ hg commit -qAm "modify y"
  $ hg bundle --base ".^" --rev . mybundle.hg --config extensions.setuprfl=$TESTTMP/setupremotefilelog.py
  1 changesets found

  $ cd ..