test-pathencode: compare current pathencoding implementations
We already have two implementations of the pathencoding (C and
Python) and this test can perfectly well be used to probabilistically
test them instead of just wasting CPU cycles and test time.
import sys, os, __builtin__
from mercurial import util
def lowerwrap(scope, funcname):
f = getattr(scope, funcname)
def wrap(fname, *args, **kwargs):
d, base = os.path.split(fname)
try:
files = os.listdir(d or '.')
except OSError, inst:
files = []
if base in files:
return f(fname, *args, **kwargs)
for fn in files:
if fn.lower() == base.lower():
return f(os.path.join(d, fn), *args, **kwargs)
return f(fname, *args, **kwargs)
scope.__dict__[funcname] = wrap
def normcase(path):
return path.lower()
os.path.normcase = normcase
for f in 'file open'.split():
lowerwrap(__builtin__, f)
for f in "chmod chown open lstat stat remove unlink".split():
lowerwrap(os, f)
for f in "exists lexists".split():
lowerwrap(os.path, f)
lowerwrap(util, 'posixfile')