test-pathencode: compare current pathencoding implementations
We already have two implementations of the pathencoding (C and
Python) and this test can perfectly well be used to probabilistically
test them instead of just wasting CPU cycles and test time.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Wix xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi">
<?include guids.wxi ?>
<?include defines.wxi ?>
<Fragment>
<DirectoryRef Id="INSTALLDIR" FileSource="$(var.SourceDir)">
<Component Id="distOutput" Guid="$(var.dist.guid)" Win64='$(var.IsX64)'>
<File Name="library.zip" KeyPath="yes" />
<File Name="mercurial.base85.pyd" />
<File Name="mercurial.bdiff.pyd" />
<File Name="mercurial.diffhelpers.pyd" />
<File Name="mercurial.mpatch.pyd" />
<File Name="mercurial.osutil.pyd" />
<File Name="mercurial.parsers.pyd" />
<File Name="pyexpat.pyd" />
<File Name="python27.dll" />
<File Name="bz2.pyd" />
<File Name="select.pyd" />
<File Name="unicodedata.pyd" />
<File Name="_ctypes.pyd" />
<File Name="_elementtree.pyd" />
<File Name="_hashlib.pyd" />
<File Name="_socket.pyd" />
<File Name="_ssl.pyd" />
</Component>
</DirectoryRef>
</Fragment>
</Wix>