tests/test-sparse-fsmonitor.t
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:45:12 -0800
changeset 41395 9087513df412
parent 33289 abd7dedbaa36
permissions -rw-r--r--
context: delete mistaken comment about return value of renamed() The comment seems to think that the return value of renamed() is a tuple of source pathsx in the parents, but it's actually a pair of (rename source path, file nodeid). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5639

This test doesn't yet work due to the way fsmonitor is integrated with test runner

  $ exit 80

test sparse interaction with other extensions

  $ hg init myrepo
  $ cd myrepo
  $ cat > .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > sparse=
  > strip=
  > EOF

Test fsmonitor integration (if available)
TODO: make fully isolated integration test a'la https://github.com/facebook/watchman/blob/master/tests/integration/WatchmanInstance.py
(this one is using the systemwide watchman instance)

  $ touch .watchmanconfig
  $ echo "ignoredir1/" >> .hgignore
  $ hg commit -Am ignoredir1
  adding .hgignore
  $ echo "ignoredir2/" >> .hgignore
  $ hg commit -m ignoredir2

  $ hg sparse --reset
  $ hg sparse -I ignoredir1 -I ignoredir2 -I dir1

  $ mkdir ignoredir1 ignoredir2 dir1
  $ touch ignoredir1/file ignoredir2/file dir1/file

Run status twice to compensate for a condition in fsmonitor where it will check
ignored files the second time it runs, regardless of previous state (ask @sid0)
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file

Test that fsmonitor ignore hash check updates when .hgignore changes

  $ hg up -q ".^"
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file
  ? ignoredir2/file