view tests/test-manifestv2.t @ 29830:92ac2baaea86

revlog: use an LRU cache for delta chain bases Profiling using statprof revealed a hotspot during changegroup application calculating delta chain bases on generaldelta repos. Essentially, revlog._addrevision() was performing a lot of redundant work tracing the delta chain as part of determining when the chain distance was acceptable. This was most pronounced when adding revisions to manifests, which can have delta chains thousands of revisions long. There was a delta chain base cache on revlogs before, but it only captured a single revision. This was acceptable before generaldelta, when _addrevision would build deltas from the previous revision and thus we'd pretty much guarantee a cache hit when resolving the delta chain base on a subsequent _addrevision call. However, it isn't suitable for generaldelta because parent revisions aren't necessarily the last processed revision. This patch converts the delta chain base cache to an LRU dict cache. The cache can hold multiple entries, so generaldelta repos have a higher chance of getting a cache hit. The impact of this change when processing changegroup additions is significant. On a generaldelta conversion of the "mozilla-unified" repo (which contains heads of the main Firefox repositories in chronological order - this means there are lots of transitions between heads in revlog order), this change has the following impact when performing an `hg unbundle` of an uncompressed bundle of the repo: before: 5:42 CPU time after: 4:34 CPU time Most of this time is saved when applying the changelog and manifest revlogs: before: 2:30 CPU time after: 1:17 CPU time That nearly a 50% reduction in CPU time applying changesets and manifests! Applying a gzipped bundle of the same repo (effectively simulating a `hg clone` over HTTP) showed a similar speedup: before: 5:53 CPU time after: 4:46 CPU time Wall time improvements were basically the same as CPU time. I didn't measure explicitly, but it feels like most of the time is saved when processing manifests. This makes sense, as large manifests tend to have very long delta chains and thus benefit the most from this cache. So, this change effectively makes changegroup application (which is used by `hg unbundle`, `hg clone`, `hg pull`, `hg unshelve`, and various other commands) significantly faster when delta chains are long (which can happen on repos with large numbers of files and thus large manifests). In theory, this change can result in more memory utilization. However, we're caching a dict of ints. At most we have 200 ints + Python object overhead per revlog. And, the cache is really only populated when performing read-heavy operations, such as adding changegroups or scanning an individual revlog. For memory bloat to be an issue, we'd need to scan/read several revisions from several revlogs all while having active references to several revlogs. I don't think there are many operations that do this, so I don't think memory bloat from the cache will be an issue.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:48:50 -0700
parents 2329ca3ebc7a
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

Create repo with old manifest

  $ cat << EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [format]
  > usegeneraldelta=yes
  > EOF

  $ hg init existing
  $ cd existing
  $ echo footext > foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ hg commit -m initial

We're using v1, so no manifestv2 entry is in requires yet.

  $ grep manifestv2 .hg/requires
  [1]

Let's clone this with manifestv2 enabled to switch to the new format for
future commits.

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone --pull existing new --config experimental.manifestv2=1
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd new

Check that entry was added to .hg/requires.

  $ grep manifestv2 .hg/requires
  manifestv2

Make a new commit.

  $ echo newfootext > foo
  $ hg commit -m new

Check that the manifest actually switched to v2.

  $ hg debugdata -m 0
  foo\x0021e958b1dca695a60ee2e9cf151753204ee0f9e9 (esc)

  $ hg debugdata -m 1
  \x00 (esc)
  \x00foo\x00 (esc)
  I\xab\x7f\xb8(\x83\xcas\x15\x9d\xc2\xd3\xd3:5\x08\xbad5_ (esc)

Check that manifestv2 is used if the requirement is present, even if it's
disabled in the config.

  $ echo newerfootext > foo
  $ hg --config experimental.manifestv2=False commit -m newer

  $ hg debugdata -m 2
  \x00 (esc)
  \x00foo\x00 (esc)
  \xa6\xb1\xfb\xef]\x91\xa1\x19`\xf3.#\x90S\xf8\x06 \xe2\x19\x00 (esc)

Check that we can still read v1 manifests.

  $ hg files -r 0
  foo

  $ cd ..

Check that entry is added to .hg/requires on repo creation

  $ hg --config experimental.manifestv2=True init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ grep manifestv2 .hg/requires
  manifestv2

Set up simple repo

  $ echo a > file1
  $ echo b > file2
  $ echo c > file3
  $ hg ci -Aqm 'initial'
  $ echo d > file2
  $ hg ci -m 'modify file2'

Check that 'hg verify', which uses manifest.readdelta(), works

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  3 files, 2 changesets, 4 total revisions

Check that manifest revlog is smaller than for v1

  $ hg debugindex -m
     rev    offset  length  delta linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0         0      81     -1       0 57361477c778 000000000000 000000000000
       1        81      33      0       1 aeaab5a2ef74 57361477c778 000000000000