view tests/test-patch.t @ 29021:92d37fb3f1aa stable

verify: don't init subrepo when missing one is referenced (issue5128) (API) Initializing a subrepo when one doesn't exist is the right thing to do when the parent is being updated, but in few other cases. Unfortunately, there isn't enough context in the subrepo module to distinguish this case. This same issue can be caused with other subrepo aware commands, so there is a general issue here beyond the scope of this fix. A simpler attempt I tried was to add an '_updating' boolean to localrepo, and set/clear it around the call to mergemod.update() in hg.updaterepo(). That mostly worked, but doesn't handle the case where archive will clone the subrepo if it is missing. (I vaguely recall that there may be other commands that will clone if needed like this, but certainly not all do. It seems both handy, and a bit surprising for what should be a read only operation. It might be nice if all commands did this consistently, but we probably need Angel's subrepo caching first, to not make a mess of the working directory.) I originally handled 'Exception' in order to pick up the Aborts raised in subrepo.state(), but this turns out to be unnecessary because that is called once and cached by ctx.sub() when iterating the subrepos. It was suggested in the bug discussion to skip looking at the subrepo links unless -S is specified. I don't really like that idea because missing a subrepo or (less likely, but worse) a corrupt .hgsubstate is a problem of the parent repo when checking out a revision. The -S option seems like a better fit for functionality that would recurse into each subrepo and do a full verification. Ultimately, the default value for 'allowcreate' should probably be flipped, but since the default behavior was to allow creation, this is less risky for now.
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
date Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:45:52 -0400
parents 0705f2ac79d6
children 75be14993fda
line wrap: on
line source

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..