view tests/test-patch-offset.t @ 46667:93e9f448273c

rhg: Add support for automatic fallback to Python

`rhg` is a command-line application that can do a small subset of what
`hg` can. It is written entirely in Rust, which avoids the cost of starting
a Python interpreter and importing many Python modules.
In a script that runs many `hg` commands, this cost can add up.

However making users decide when to use `rhg` instead of `hg` is
not practical as we want the subset of supported functionality
to grow over time.

Instead we introduce "fallback" behavior where, when `rhg` encounters
something (a sub-command, a repository format, …) that is not implemented
in Rust-only, it does nothing but silently start a subprocess of
Python-based `hg` running the same command.
That way `rhg` becomes a drop-in replacement for `hg` that sometimes
goes faster. Whether Python is used should be an implementation detail
not apparent to users (other than through speed).

A new `fallback` value is added to the previously introduced
`rhg.on-unsupported` configuration key. When in this mode, the new
`rhg.fallback-executable` config is determine what command to use
to run a Python-based `hg`.

The previous `rhg.on-unsupported = abort-silent` configuration was designed
to let a wrapper script call `rhg` and then fall back to `hg` based on the
exit code. This is still available, but having fallback behavior built-in
in rhg might be easier for users instead of leaving that script "as an
exercise for the reader".

Using a subprocess like this is not idea, especially when `rhg` is to be
installed in `$PATH` as `hg`, since the other `hg.py` executable needs
to still be available… somewhere. Eventually this could be replaced
by using PyOxidizer to a have a single executable that embeds a Python
interpreter, but only starts it when needed.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10093

  $ cat > writepatterns.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > 
  > path = sys.argv[1]
  > patterns = sys.argv[2:]
  > 
  > fp = open(path, 'wb')
  > for pattern in patterns:
  >     count = int(pattern[0:-1])
  >     char = pattern[-1].encode('utf8') + b'\n'
  >     fp.write(char * count)
  > fp.close()
  > EOF

prepare repo

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

These initial lines of Xs were not in the original file used to generate
the patch.  So all the patch hunks need to be applied to a constant offset
within this file.  If the offset isn't tracked then the hunks can be
applied to the wrong lines of this file.

  $ "$PYTHON" ../writepatterns.py a 34X 10A 1B 10A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 10A 1E 10A 1B 10A
  $ hg commit -Am adda
  adding a

This is a cleaner patch generated via diff
In this case it reproduces the problem when
the output of hg export does not
import patch

  $ hg import -v -m 'b' -d '2 0' - <<EOF
  > --- a/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > +++ b/a	2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
  > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
  >  A
  >  A
  >  B
  > -A
  > +a
  >  A
  >  A
  >  A
  > EOF
  applying patch from stdin
  patching file a
  Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 (offset 34 lines).
  Hunk #3 succeeded at 109 (offset 34 lines).
  committing files:
  a
  committing manifest
  committing changelog
  created 189885cecb41

compare imported changes against reference file

  $ "$PYTHON" ../writepatterns.py aref 34X 10A 1B 1a 9A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 1a 9A 1E 10A 1B 1a 9A
  $ diff aref a

  $ cd ..