tests/test-merge-combination-misc.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:41:38 +0100
changeset 46314 95a615dd77bf
parent 46266 e8b0c519dfb3
permissions -rw-r--r--
clone: make sure we warm the cache after a clone This work around any deviciency/limitation of the clone process. In our case this ensure the persistent nodemap exist with valid content. Ideally, the cloning process would also do "the right thing". However since older server will never be able to do "the right thing". The local workaround will be necessary anyway. I am not worried by the performance impact of this as `hg clone` is non-instant on large repositories where is could matters. Warming the cache if they are already correct is very fast. And if they are not already warm, this seems like a good time to do so. This impact various test as more cache are now warmed sooner, all the change should be harmless. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9789

Testing recorded "modified" files for merge commit
==================================================

This file shows what hg says are "modified" files for a merge commit
(hg log -T {files}), somewhat exhaustively.

This file test multiple corner case.

For merges that involve files contents changing, check test-merge-combination-file-content.t

For merges that involve executable bit changing, check test-merge-combination-exec-bytes.t


Case with multiple or zero merge ancestors, copies/renames, and identical file contents
with different filelog revisions are not currently covered.

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/merge-combination-util.sh

Files modified or cleanly merged, with no greatest common ancestors:

  $ hg init repo; cd repo
  $ touch a0 b0; hg commit -qAm 0
  $ hg up -qr null; touch a1 b1; hg commit -qAm 1
  $ hg merge -qr 0; rm b*; hg commit -qAm 2
  $ hg log -r . -T '{files}\n'
  b0 b1
  $ cd ../
  $ rm -rf repo

A few cases of criss-cross merges involving deletions (listing all
such merges is probably too much). Both gcas contain $files, so we
expect the final merge to behave like a merge with a single gca
containing $files.

  $ hg init repo; cd repo
  $ files="c1 u1 c2 u2"
  $ touch $files; hg commit -qAm '0 root'
  $ for f in $files; do echo f > $f; done; hg commit -qAm '1 gca1'
  $ hg up -qr0; hg revert -qr 1 --all; hg commit -qAm '2 gca2'
  $ hg up -qr 1; hg merge -qr 2; rm *1; hg commit -qAm '3 p1'
  $ hg up -qr 2; hg merge -qr 1; rm *2; hg commit -qAm '4 p2'
  $ hg merge -qr 3; echo f > u1; echo f > u2; rm -f c1 c2
  $ hg commit -qAm '5 merge with two gcas'
  $ hg log -r . -T '{files}\n' # expecting u1 u2
  
  $ cd ../
  $ rm -rf repo