view mercurial/similar.py @ 35569:964212780daf

rust: implementation of `hg` This commit provides a mostly-working implementation of the `hg` script in Rust along with scaffolding to support Rust in the repository. If you are familiar with Rust, the contents of the added rust/ directory should be pretty straightforward. We create an "hgcli" package that implements a binary application to run Mercurial. The output of this package is an "hg" binary. Our Rust `hg` (henceforth "rhg") essentially is a port of the existing `hg` Python script. The main difference is the creation of the embedded CPython interpreter is handled by the binary itself instead of relying on the shebang. In that sense, rhg is more similar to the "exe wrapper" we currently use on Windows. However, unlike the exe wrapper, rhg does not call the `hg` Python script. Instead, it uses the CPython APIs to import mercurial modules and call appropriate functions. The amount of code here is surprisingly small. It is my intent to replace the existing C-based exe wrapper with rhg. Preferably in the next Mercurial release. This should be achievable - at least for some Mercurial distributions. The future/timeline for rhg on other platforms is less clear. We already ship a hg.exe on Windows. So if we get the quirks with Rust worked out, shipping a Rust-based hg.exe should hopefully not be too contentious. Now onto the implementation. We're using python27-sys and the cpython crates for talking to the CPython API. We currently don't use too much functionality of the cpython crate and could have probably cut it out. However, it does provide a reasonable abstraction over unsafe {} CPython function calls. While we still have our fair share of those, at least we're not dealing with too much refcounting, error checking, etc. So I think the use of the cpython crate is justified. Plus, there is not-yet-implemented functionality that could benefit from cpython. I see our use of this crate only increasing. The cpython and python27-sys crates are not without their issues. The cpython crate didn't seem to account for the embedding use case in its design. Instead, it seems to assume that you are building a Python extension. It is making some questionable decisions around certain CPython APIs. For example, it insists that PyEval_ThreadsInitialized() is called and that the Python code likely isn't the main thread in the underlying application. It is also missing some functionality that is important for embedded use cases (such as exporting the path to the Python interpreter from its build script). After spending several hours trying to wrangle python27-sys and cpython, I gave up and forked the project on GitHub. Our Cargo.toml tracks this fork. I'm optimistic that the upstream project will accept our contributions and we can eventually unfork. There is a non-trivial amount of code in our custom Cargo build script. Our build.rs (which is called as part of building the hgcli crate): * Validates that the Python interpreter that was detected by the python27-sys crate provides a shared library (we only support shared library linking at this time - although this restriction could be loosened). * Validates that the Python is built with UCS-4 support. This ensures maximum Unicode compatibility. * Exports variables to the crate build allowing the built crate to e.g. find the path to the Python interpreter. The produced rhg should be considered alpha quality. There are several known deficiencies. Many of these are documented with inline TODOs. Probably the biggest limitation of rhg is that it assumes it is running from the ./rust/target/<target> directory of a source distribution. So, rhg is currently not very practical for real-world use. But, if you can `cargo build` it, running the binary *should* yield a working Mercurial CLI. In order to support using rhg with the test harness, we needed to hack up run-tests.py so the path to Mercurial's Python files is set properly. The change is extremely hacky and is only intended to be a stop-gap until the test harness gains first-class support for installing rhg. This will likely occur after we support running rhg outside the source directory. Despite its officially alpha quality, rhg copes extremely well with the test harness (at least on Linux). Using `run-tests.py --with-hg ../rust/target/debug/hg`, I only encounter the following failures: * test-run-tests.t -- Warnings emitted about using an unexpected Mercurial library. This is due to the hacky nature of setting the Python directory when run-tests.py detected rhg. * test-devel-warnings.t -- Expected stack trace missing frame for `hg` (This is expected since we no longer have an `hg` script!) * test-convert.t -- Test running `$PYTHON "$BINDIR"/hg`, which obviously assumes `hg` is a Python script. * test-merge-tools.t -- Same assumption about `hg` being executable with Python. * test-http-bad-server.t -- Seeing exit code 255 instead of 1 around line 358. * test-blackbox.t -- Exit code 255 instead of 1. * test-basic.t -- Exit code 255 instead of 1. It certainly looks like we have a bug around exit code handling. I don't think it is severe enough to hold up review and landing of this initial implementation. Perfect is the enemy of good. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1581
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:53:22 -0800
parents ded48ad55146
children cd196be26cb7
line wrap: on
line source

# similar.py - mechanisms for finding similar files
#
# Copyright 2005-2007 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import

from .i18n import _
from . import (
    mdiff,
)

def _findexactmatches(repo, added, removed):
    '''find renamed files that have no changes

    Takes a list of new filectxs and a list of removed filectxs, and yields
    (before, after) tuples of exact matches.
    '''
    numfiles = len(added) + len(removed)

    # Build table of removed files: {hash(fctx.data()): [fctx, ...]}.
    # We use hash() to discard fctx.data() from memory.
    hashes = {}
    for i, fctx in enumerate(removed):
        repo.ui.progress(_('searching for exact renames'), i, total=numfiles,
                         unit=_('files'))
        h = hash(fctx.data())
        if h not in hashes:
            hashes[h] = [fctx]
        else:
            hashes[h].append(fctx)

    # For each added file, see if it corresponds to a removed file.
    for i, fctx in enumerate(added):
        repo.ui.progress(_('searching for exact renames'), i + len(removed),
                total=numfiles, unit=_('files'))
        adata = fctx.data()
        h = hash(adata)
        for rfctx in hashes.get(h, []):
            # compare between actual file contents for exact identity
            if adata == rfctx.data():
                yield (rfctx, fctx)
                break

    # Done
    repo.ui.progress(_('searching for exact renames'), None)

def _ctxdata(fctx):
    # lazily load text
    orig = fctx.data()
    return orig, mdiff.splitnewlines(orig)

def _score(fctx, otherdata):
    orig, lines = otherdata
    text = fctx.data()
    # mdiff.blocks() returns blocks of matching lines
    # count the number of bytes in each
    equal = 0
    matches = mdiff.blocks(text, orig)
    for x1, x2, y1, y2 in matches:
        for line in lines[y1:y2]:
            equal += len(line)

    lengths = len(text) + len(orig)
    return equal * 2.0 / lengths

def score(fctx1, fctx2):
    return _score(fctx1, _ctxdata(fctx2))

def _findsimilarmatches(repo, added, removed, threshold):
    '''find potentially renamed files based on similar file content

    Takes a list of new filectxs and a list of removed filectxs, and yields
    (before, after, score) tuples of partial matches.
    '''
    copies = {}
    for i, r in enumerate(removed):
        repo.ui.progress(_('searching for similar files'), i,
                         total=len(removed), unit=_('files'))

        data = None
        for a in added:
            bestscore = copies.get(a, (None, threshold))[1]
            if data is None:
                data = _ctxdata(r)
            myscore = _score(a, data)
            if myscore > bestscore:
                copies[a] = (r, myscore)
    repo.ui.progress(_('searching'), None)

    for dest, v in copies.iteritems():
        source, bscore = v
        yield source, dest, bscore

def _dropempty(fctxs):
    return [x for x in fctxs if x.size() > 0]

def findrenames(repo, added, removed, threshold):
    '''find renamed files -- yields (before, after, score) tuples'''
    wctx = repo[None]
    pctx = wctx.p1()

    # Zero length files will be frequently unrelated to each other, and
    # tracking the deletion/addition of such a file will probably cause more
    # harm than good. We strip them out here to avoid matching them later on.
    addedfiles = _dropempty(wctx[fp] for fp in sorted(added))
    removedfiles = _dropempty(pctx[fp] for fp in sorted(removed) if fp in pctx)

    # Find exact matches.
    matchedfiles = set()
    for (a, b) in _findexactmatches(repo, addedfiles, removedfiles):
        matchedfiles.add(b)
        yield (a.path(), b.path(), 1.0)

    # If the user requested similar files to be matched, search for them also.
    if threshold < 1.0:
        addedfiles = [x for x in addedfiles if x not in matchedfiles]
        for (a, b, score) in _findsimilarmatches(repo, addedfiles,
                                                 removedfiles, threshold):
            yield (a.path(), b.path(), score)