Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-convert-cvs-detectmerge.t @ 35569:964212780daf
rust: implementation of `hg`
This commit provides a mostly-working implementation of the
`hg` script in Rust along with scaffolding to support Rust in
the repository.
If you are familiar with Rust, the contents of the added rust/
directory should be pretty straightforward. We create an "hgcli"
package that implements a binary application to run Mercurial.
The output of this package is an "hg" binary.
Our Rust `hg` (henceforth "rhg") essentially is a port of the existing
`hg` Python script. The main difference is the creation of the embedded
CPython interpreter is handled by the binary itself instead of relying
on the shebang. In that sense, rhg is more similar to the "exe wrapper"
we currently use on Windows. However, unlike the exe wrapper, rhg does
not call the `hg` Python script. Instead, it uses the CPython APIs to
import mercurial modules and call appropriate functions. The amount of
code here is surprisingly small.
It is my intent to replace the existing C-based exe wrapper with rhg.
Preferably in the next Mercurial release. This should be achievable -
at least for some Mercurial distributions. The future/timeline for
rhg on other platforms is less clear. We already ship a hg.exe on
Windows. So if we get the quirks with Rust worked out, shipping a
Rust-based hg.exe should hopefully not be too contentious.
Now onto the implementation.
We're using python27-sys and the cpython crates for talking to the
CPython API. We currently don't use too much functionality of the
cpython crate and could have probably cut it out. However, it does
provide a reasonable abstraction over unsafe {} CPython function
calls. While we still have our fair share of those, at least we're
not dealing with too much refcounting, error checking, etc. So I
think the use of the cpython crate is justified. Plus, there is
not-yet-implemented functionality that could benefit from cpython. I
see our use of this crate only increasing.
The cpython and python27-sys crates are not without their issues.
The cpython crate didn't seem to account for the embedding use case
in its design. Instead, it seems to assume that you are building
a Python extension. It is making some questionable decisions around
certain CPython APIs. For example, it insists that
PyEval_ThreadsInitialized() is called and that the Python code
likely isn't the main thread in the underlying application. It
is also missing some functionality that is important for embedded
use cases (such as exporting the path to the Python interpreter
from its build script). After spending several hours trying to
wrangle python27-sys and cpython, I gave up and forked the project
on GitHub. Our Cargo.toml tracks this fork. I'm optimistic that
the upstream project will accept our contributions and we can
eventually unfork.
There is a non-trivial amount of code in our custom Cargo build
script. Our build.rs (which is called as part of building the hgcli
crate):
* Validates that the Python interpreter that was detected by the
python27-sys crate provides a shared library (we only support
shared library linking at this time - although this restriction
could be loosened).
* Validates that the Python is built with UCS-4 support. This ensures
maximum Unicode compatibility.
* Exports variables to the crate build allowing the built crate to e.g.
find the path to the Python interpreter.
The produced rhg should be considered alpha quality. There are several
known deficiencies. Many of these are documented with inline TODOs.
Probably the biggest limitation of rhg is that it assumes it is
running from the ./rust/target/<target> directory of a source
distribution. So, rhg is currently not very practical for real-world
use. But, if you can `cargo build` it, running the binary *should*
yield a working Mercurial CLI.
In order to support using rhg with the test harness, we needed to hack
up run-tests.py so the path to Mercurial's Python files is set properly.
The change is extremely hacky and is only intended to be a stop-gap
until the test harness gains first-class support for installing rhg.
This will likely occur after we support running rhg outside the
source directory.
Despite its officially alpha quality, rhg copes extremely well with
the test harness (at least on Linux). Using
`run-tests.py --with-hg ../rust/target/debug/hg`, I only encounter
the following failures:
* test-run-tests.t -- Warnings emitted about using an unexpected
Mercurial library. This is due to the hacky nature of setting the
Python directory when run-tests.py detected rhg.
* test-devel-warnings.t -- Expected stack trace missing frame for `hg`
(This is expected since we no longer have an `hg` script!)
* test-convert.t -- Test running `$PYTHON "$BINDIR"/hg`, which obviously
assumes `hg` is a Python script.
* test-merge-tools.t -- Same assumption about `hg` being executable with
Python.
* test-http-bad-server.t -- Seeing exit code 255 instead of 1 around
line 358.
* test-blackbox.t -- Exit code 255 instead of 1.
* test-basic.t -- Exit code 255 instead of 1.
It certainly looks like we have a bug around exit code handling. I
don't think it is severe enough to hold up review and landing of this
initial implementation. Perfect is the enemy of good.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1581
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:53:22 -0800 |
parents | 96529f81e2e9 |
children | e5e5ee2b60e4 |
line wrap: on
line source
#require cvs Test config convert.cvsps.mergefrom config setting. (Should test similar mergeto feature, but I don't understand it yet.) Requires builtin cvsps. $ CVSROOT=`pwd`/cvsrepo $ export CVSROOT $ cvscall() > { > cvs -f "$@" > } output of 'cvs ci' varies unpredictably, so just discard it XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic $ cvsci() > { > sleep 1 > cvs -f ci "$@" > /dev/null > } XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [extensions] > convert = > [convert] > cvsps.cache = 0 > cvsps.mergefrom = \[MERGE from (\S+)\] > EOF create cvs repository with one project $ cvscall -q -d "$CVSROOT" init $ mkdir cvsrepo/proj populate cvs repository $ cvscall -Q co proj $ cd proj $ touch file1 $ cvscall -Q add file1 $ cvsci -m"add file1 on trunk" cvs commit: Examining . create two release branches $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_0 T file1 $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_1 T file1 modify file1 on branch v1_0 $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_0 $ sleep 1 $ echo "change" >> file1 $ cvsci -m"add text" cvs commit: Examining . make unrelated change on v1_1 $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1 $ touch unrelated $ cvscall -Q add unrelated $ cvsci -m"unrelated change" cvs commit: Examining . merge file1 to v1_1 $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_0 RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.1.2.1 Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.2.1 into file1 $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_0]" cvs commit: Examining . merge change to trunk $ cvscall -Q update -A $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_1 RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.1.4.1 Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.4.1 into file1 $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_1]" cvs commit: Examining . non-merged change on trunk $ echo "foo" > file2 $ cvscall -Q add file2 $ cvsci -m"add file2 on trunk" file2 this will create rev 1.3 change on trunk to backport $ echo "backport me" >> file1 $ cvsci -m"add other text" file1 $ cvscall log file1 RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v Working file: file1 head: 1.3 branch: locks: strict access list: symbolic names: v1_1: 1.1.0.4 v1_0: 1.1.0.2 keyword substitution: kv total revisions: 5; selected revisions: 5 description: ---------------------------- revision 1.3 date: * (glob) add other text ---------------------------- revision 1.2 date: * (glob) add text [MERGE from v1_1] ---------------------------- revision 1.1 date: * (glob) branches: 1.1.2; 1.1.4; add file1 on trunk ---------------------------- revision 1.1.4.1 date: * (glob) add text [MERGE from v1_0] ---------------------------- revision 1.1.2.1 date: * (glob) add text ============================================================================= XXX how many ways are there to spell "trunk" with CVS? backport trunk change to v1_1 $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1 $ cvscall -Q update -j1.2 -j1.3 file1 RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 Merging differences between 1.2 and 1.3 into file1 $ cvsci -m"add other text [MERGE from HEAD]" file1 fix bug on v1_1, merge to trunk with error $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1 $ echo "merge forward" >> file1 $ cvscall -Q tag unmerged $ cvsci -m"fix file1" cvs commit: Examining . $ cvscall -Q update -A $ cvscall -Q update -junmerged -jv1_1 RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v retrieving revision 1.1.4.2 retrieving revision 1.1.4.3 Merging differences between 1.1.4.2 and 1.1.4.3 into file1 note the typo in the commit log message $ cvsci -m"fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]" cvs commit: Examining . $ cvs -Q tag -d unmerged convert to hg $ cd .. $ hg convert proj proj.hg initializing destination proj.hg repository connecting to $TESTTMP/cvsrepo scanning source... collecting CVS rlog 12 log entries creating changesets warning: CVS commit message references non-existent branch 'v1-1': fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1] 10 changeset entries sorting... converting... 9 add file1 on trunk 8 unrelated change 7 add text 6 add text [MERGE from v1_0] 5 add text [MERGE from v1_1] 4 add file2 on trunk 3 add other text 2 add other text [MERGE from HEAD] 1 fix file1 0 fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1] complete log $ template="{rev}: '{branches}' {desc}\n" $ hg -R proj.hg log --template="$template" 9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1] 8: 'v1_1' fix file1 7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD] 6: '' add other text 5: '' add file2 on trunk 4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1] 3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0] 2: 'v1_0' add text 1: 'v1_1' unrelated change 0: '' add file1 on trunk graphical log $ hg -R proj.hg log -G --template="$template" o 9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1] | | o 8: 'v1_1' fix file1 | | | o 7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD] |/| o | 6: '' add other text | | o | 5: '' add file2 on trunk | | o | 4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1] |\| | o 3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0] | |\ +---o 2: 'v1_0' add text | | | o 1: 'v1_1' unrelated change |/ o 0: '' add file1 on trunk