view tests/test-hghave.t @ 31584:985a98c6bad0

similar: use cheaper hash() function to test exact matches

We just need a hash table {fctx.data(): fctx} which doesn't keep fctx.data()
in memory. Let's simply use hash(fctx.data()) to put data out from memory,
and manage collided fctx objects by list.

This isn't significantly faster than using sha1, but is more correct as we
know SHA-1 collision attack is getting practical.

Benchmark with 50k added/removed files, on tmpfs:

  $ hg addremove --dry-run --time -q

  previous:   real 12.420 secs (user 11.120+0.000 sys 1.280+0.000)
  this patch: real 12.350 secs (user 11.210+0.000 sys 1.140+0.000)

Testing that hghave does not crash when checking features

  $ hghave --test-features 2>/dev/null

Testing hghave extensibility for third party tools

  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
  > import hghave
  > @hghave.check("custom", "custom hghave feature")
  > def has_custom():
  >     return True
  > EOF

(invocation via run-tests.py)

  $ cat > test-hghaveaddon.t <<EOF
  > #require custom
  >   $ echo foo
  >   foo
  > EOF
  $ run-tests.py $HGTEST_RUN_TESTS_PURE test-hghaveaddon.t
  .
  # Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 warned, 0 failed.

(invocation via command line)

  $ unset TESTDIR
  $ hghave custom

(terminate with exit code 2 at failure of importing hghaveaddon.py)

  $ rm hghaveaddon.*
  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
  > importing this file should cause syntax error
  > EOF

  $ hghave custom
  failed to import hghaveaddon.py from '.': invalid syntax (hghaveaddon.py, line 1)
  [2]