view tests/test-simple-update.t @ 28487:98d98a645e9d

changelog: add class to represent parsed changelog revisions Currently, changelog entries are parsed into their respective components at read time. Many operations are only interested in a subset of fields of a changelog entry. The parsing and storing of all the fields adds avoidable overhead. This patch introduces the "changelogrevision" class. It takes changelog raw text and exposes the parsed results as attributes. The code for parsing changelog entries has been moved into its construction function. changelog.read() has been modified to use the new class internally while maintaining its existing API. Future patches will make revision parsing lazy. We implement the construction function of the new class with __new__ instead of __init__ so we can use a named tuple to represent the empty revision. This saves overhead and complexity of coercing later versions of this class to represent an empty instance. While we are here, we add a method on changelog to obtain an instance of the new type. The overhead of constructing the new class regresses performance of revsets accessing this data: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.929984 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.935642 105% date(2015) 0.878797 0.908094 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.922624 106% author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.902112 105% author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.860977 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 1.005824 author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.743381 Once lazy parsing is implemented, these revsets will all be faster than before. There is no performance change on revsets that do not access this data. There /could/ be a performance regression on operations that perform several changelog reads. However, I can't think of anything outside of revsets and `hg log` (basically the same as a revset) that would be impacted.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:28:02 -0800
parents f2719b387380
children 92bca12328d1
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo foo>foo
  $ hg addremove
  adding foo
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

  $ hg clone . ../branch
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ../branch
  $ hg co
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo bar>>foo
  $ hg commit -m "2"

  $ cd ../test

  $ hg pull ../branch
  pulling from ../branch
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions

  $ hg co
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat foo
  foo
  bar

  $ hg manifest --debug
  6f4310b00b9a147241b071a60c28a650827fb03d 644   foo

update to rev 0 with a date

  $ hg upd -d foo 0
  abort: you can't specify a revision and a date
  [255]

  $ cd ..