tests/test-patch.t

histedit: preserve initial author on fold (issue4296)

When the authorship of the changeset folded in does not match that of
the base changeset, we currently use the configured ui.username
instead. This is especially surprising when the user is not the author
of either of the changesets. In such cases, the resulting authorship
(the user's) is clearly incorrect. Even when the user is folding in a
patch they authored themselves, it's not clear whether they should
take over the authorship. Let's instead keep it simple and always
preserve the base changeset's authorship. This is also how
"git rebase -i" handles folding/squashing.

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..