view tests/test-generaldelta.t @ 24787:9d5c27890790

largefiles: for update -C, only update largefiles when necessary

Before, a --clean update with largefiles would use the "optimization" that it
didn't read hashes from standin files before and after the update. Instead of
trusting the content of the standin files, it would rehash all the actual
largefiles that lfdirstate reported clean and update the standins that didn't
have the expected content. It could thus in some "impossible" situations
automatically recover from some "largefile got out sync with its standin"
issues (even there apparently still were weird corner cases where it could
fail). This extra checking is similar to what core --clean intentionally do
not do, and it made update --clean unbearable slow.

Usually in core Mercurial, --clean will rely on the dirstate to find the files
it should update. (It is thus intentionally possible (when trying to trick the
system or if there should be bugs) to end up in situations where --clean not
will restore the working directory content correctly.) Checking every file when
we "know" it is ok is however not an option - that would be too slow.

Instead, trust the content of the standin files. Use the same logic for --clean
as for linear updates and trust the dirstate and that our "logic" will keep
them in sync. It is much cheaper to just rehash the largefiles reported dirty
by a status walk and read all standins than to hash largefiles.

Most of the changes are just a change of indentation now when the different
kinds of updates no longer are handled that differently. Standins for added
files are however only written when doing a normal update, while deleted and
removed files only will be updated for --clean updates.

Check whether size of generaldelta revlog is not bigger than its
regular equivalent. Test would fail if generaldelta was naive
implementation of parentdelta: third manifest revision would be fully
inserted due to big distance from its paren revision (zero).

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg commit -q -Am boo
  $ hg clone --pull . ../gdrepo -q --config format.generaldelta=yes
  $ for r in 1 2 3; do
  >   echo $r > foo
  >   hg commit -q -m $r
  >   hg up -q -r 0
  >   hg pull . -q -r $r -R ../gdrepo
  > done

  $ cd ..
  >>> import os
  >>> regsize = os.stat("repo/.hg/store/00manifest.i").st_size
  >>> gdsize = os.stat("gdrepo/.hg/store/00manifest.i").st_size
  >>> if regsize < gdsize:
  ...     print 'generaldata increased size of manifest'

Verify rev reordering doesnt create invalid bundles (issue4462)
This requires a commit tree that when pulled will reorder manifest revs such
that the second manifest to create a file rev will be ordered before the first
manifest to create that file rev. We also need to do a partial pull to ensure
reordering happens. At the end we verify the linkrev points at the earliest
commit.

  $ hg init server --config format.generaldelta=True
  $ cd server
  $ touch a
  $ hg commit -Aqm a
  $ echo x > x
  $ echo y > y
  $ hg commit -Aqm xy
  $ hg up -q '.^'
  $ echo x > x
  $ echo z > z
  $ hg commit -Aqm xz
  $ hg up -q 1
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg commit -Aqm b
  $ hg merge -q 2
  $ hg commit -Aqm merge
  $ echo c > c
  $ hg commit -Aqm c
  $ hg log -G -T '{rev} {shortest(node)} {desc}'
  @  5 ebb8 c
  |
  o    4 baf7 merge
  |\
  | o  3 a129 b
  | |
  o |  2 958c xz
  | |
  | o  1 f00c xy
  |/
  o  0 3903 a
  
  $ cd ..
  $ hg init client
  $ cd client
  $ hg pull -q ../server -r 4
  $ hg debugindex x
     rev    offset  length   base linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0         0       3      0       1 1406e7411862 000000000000 000000000000